UDPride Discussion Forums    
     

Go Back   UDPride Discussion Forums

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Advertisement
View Single Post
  #31  
Old 02-04-2018, 07:15 PM
jumpin' joe's Avatar
jumpin' joe jumpin' joe is offline
Brigadier General
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 2,086
Thanks: 768
Thanked 2,029 Times in 766 Posts
jumpin' joe has a reputation beyond reputejumpin' joe has a reputation beyond reputejumpin' joe has a reputation beyond reputejumpin' joe has a reputation beyond reputejumpin' joe has a reputation beyond reputejumpin' joe has a reputation beyond reputejumpin' joe has a reputation beyond reputejumpin' joe has a reputation beyond reputejumpin' joe has a reputation beyond reputejumpin' joe has a reputation beyond reputejumpin' joe has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ud69 View Post
To answer -

1) Video only. You never see the refs put on headphones for sound. Therefore, if it is permissible to do a video review for a shot clock violation - and it is - the only reason to do so would be to look for video (shot clock) verification. There is no audio during a video review.

I have seen refs put on headphones for reviews at games. Many times it's probably to talk to the video guy, but review of sound can be available. Why would the NCAA have a rule for audio review of the horn if, as you say, it's video only? The rules clearly states to review audio for the horn first and if it's not available to review the video.
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to jumpin' joe For This Totally Excellent Post:
CT Flyer (02-12-2018)
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement System V2.6 By   Branden

     
 
Copyright 1996-2012 UDPride.com. All Rights Reserved.