It'd still be an NCAA violation even if it weren't illegal.
As far as inside influences affecting the value of a University's "asset", that sounds like it might make sense. A coach should be working for the school that's paying him without having a conflict of interest. Although I'm not sure how it makes a player less of an asset to suggest financial advisor X instead of financial advisor Y.
As far as outside influences affecting the value of a University's "asset", that makes it sound like the University owns the players.
|