03-09-2018, 11:53 AM
|
|
I Am A Statistical God
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Riverside, Ohio
Posts: 5,511
Thanks: 4,692
Thanked 6,171 Times in 2,321 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by CT Flyer
For all the people that don't want to give Svoboda a chance to develop, what makes his frosh year much different than X's stats wise? You were all willing to give X a chance to develop (I didn't and said he would never amount to anything, of which I admit I was wrong) and X proved that he could develop after a very lackluster frosh year. I say MS still has a chance to develop now that he's had a year to learn the college game and will have a full off season with the staff to work on the things he needs to do to get better.
|
Xeyrius Williams (2015) vs Matej Svoboda (2017)
Code:
ud | gms | strt | mins | fg_tp_ft_pct | pts | rebs | asts | tos
----+-----+------+-------------+-------------------+-----------+----------+----------+----------
XW | 24 | 0 | 244 (10.20) | 0.455/0.273/0.750 | 52 (2.17) | 43 (1.8) | 5 (0.2) | 12 (0.5)
MS | 28 | 0 | 318 (11.40) | 0.329/0.200/1.000 | 61 (2.18) | 33 (1.2) | 17 (0.6) | 25 (0.9)
|