Originally Posted by Flyers98
More than 10 out 224 I would say. I am not sure what would be considered a statistically significant sample size...Figgie? But more than 10 out of 224. I also think that a hallmark of good statistical analysis is not pointing to one event or a small group of events. If you have all the data, use all the data. I am sure I could point to games where he played significant minutes and scored less than 10 points, (by the way scoring in double figures in the NBA is not benchmark that I am aware of and if it is I suggest it is akin to the Mendoza line in baseball, in that it is a benchmark for not sucking, not for being good).
Maybe some of the folks on this board can re-direct some of their fire the coach energy to NYC.
|
You can't compare 10 to 224, because you're comparing against three years of 12-15 minutes per game vs starting and playing an entire game. The dynamics of starting and playing more are significantly different than coming in for short spells.
