Originally Posted by ud2
IMO, there is all the difference in the world between when Archie left vs. now.
Had we hired one of Archie's assistants, we would be looking to continue what Archie started. Archie was 4/6, the program was in excellent shape, everybody was happy, the fans were fat and happy.
With Grant, 58% of the fans want him fired after next year, the program is definitely on the rocks right now, many are unhappy. Why would we want more of what Grant brought?
See the difference?
|
No, because none of AMs assistants had any qualification to be the head coach. Zero. Whether Greer has that, I can't say, but Ostrom, Kuwik, and Griffen, none of them were ready to be a HC. And in the 6 years since AM left, none of them have been a HC, which pretty much proves that none of them were the right candidate.