Originally Posted by ud2
Yes, but the NET ranking is just about a complete unknown at this time, there has been very little explanation of the formula used to manufacture it.
I would like to have a baseline, whether it be rpi, bpi, kenpom, kpi, or whatever, to compare the NET too.
I have a feeling that the NET is not going to be an improvement over the old method that the selection committee used.
|
What I really want to see is how it would look if data from last season were input into the NET calculation.
How different would have the teams in the field and seeding have been?
To my knowledge, it's never been published.
Until something like that is done, I don't know how anyone can really predict anything outside of the very top teams and the likely conference tournament champions.
