![Old](http://www.udpride.com/forums/images/softblue/statusicon/post_old.gif)
03-03-2017, 08:08 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,238
Thanks: 3,991
Thanked 4,603 Times in 2,849 Posts
|
|
Sorry...
Originally Posted by OSU Flyer
I think the difference this time is that's there would be 1-3 basketball schools vs 7 & the basketball schools would be the ones joining understanding the arrangement. The C7 were unhappy with basketball dead weight being added with ECU, Tulane, etc. the dynamic then & now would be different. They were unhappy with the direction of the conference whereas if we joined it'd be because we wanted to be a part of it.
Their interests are different but that wouldn't preclude a mutually beneficial relationship.
We've got one one FBS school in UMass & has Temple & the A10 found a way to make those relationships work.
If UMass leaves for a football league, VCU joins this league or the BE expands again & we get left out the University needs to be proactive so the Flyers aren't stuck in a situation like Wichita
Posted via Mobile Device
|
A single FB school in a BB conference like the UMass and Temple examples worked. But a conference with roughly equal number of FB and BB-only schools is what did not work for the old BE. That lesson has been learned.
|