Originally Posted by UDDoug
One game is an isolated data point by definition. Why don't we just say we should have hired the former coach at Buffalo because he beat an Archie Miller team by 30 and gave them the worst home loss in UD history (IIRC)?
There has been more scheme change at Xavier than you think. They don't run the same offenses or defenses under Mack than Miller. And Miller didn't run the same defense as Matta. Is the succession due to good coaches being promoted, or continuation of system. I think it's far more of the former since most of the ex-coaches have gone on to success at their next stop.
|
I was also referring to the other points I brought up, not just the score to one game.
There has not been that much change, maybe a few minor tweaks here and there, but still essentially the same system, all of those guys are basically from the same coaching tree.
Going from Archie to Grant though is going to be a major change. Grant's offense is nothing at all like Archie's.
