UDPride Discussion Forums    
     

Go Back   UDPride Discussion Forums

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Advertisement
View Single Post
  #22  
Old 03-22-2018, 02:34 PM
UACFlyer UACFlyer is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,238
Thanks: 3,991
Thanked 4,603 Times in 2,849 Posts
UACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond repute
Propsed NCAA rule

I believe a HS player should be held to his commitment to a school when there is a coaching change. The commitment should be viewed as being made to the school...not the coach who recruited him.

It could work like this. If there is a coaching change a kid is required to play for one year under the new coach. After one year the player can transfer to another school without penalty, i.e., does not have to sit for year before playing. In my opinion, kids would give the new coach a chance and many would choose not to transfer. Such an approach would be far less disruptive than the present system whereby an entire incoming class may be lost.

Just opinion.
Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement System V2.6 By   Branden

     
 
Copyright 1996-2012 UDPride.com. All Rights Reserved.