If team performance is a factor here then why is the question ... best Flyer player of the decade? It's not any one players fault that they didn't get in, or didn't win a game in the NCAA's. If that's the case then KW is a TRIPLE overtime loss to DePaul from being 'tied' with CW in this category (not too mention two NIT's and two NCAA's during that period). BRob is a selection committee's split hair and a broken foot away from the dance. BRob is a Trent Meachum away from this not even being a discussion whatsoever and likely the #1 scorer in UD history. This 'team' criteria for an individual sort of accolade makes no sense. When you play on teams that had more pieces in place, and had 3-4 years of momentum and coaching behind them, you are more likely to have experienced tournament play at it's highest level. Both KW and CW benifited from being on teams, that relative to the program and coach, were hitting on all cylinders by the time they arrived. BRob clearly did not ... and yet he put the Flyers on his shoulder's and took decent talent to a pretty high level of competition.
Still confused why people keep saying BRob never won anything? During his time we averaged 18.5 wins and made a quarterfinal NIT run ... not bad given the fluidity of the team (transfers) and the caliber of his teammates during this time period.
|