I'm happy with our scheduling for the most part. Neil doesn't have any easy job and there's about million articles from the national writers backing up the difficulty teams in our position have in that department.
Only thing I would change is in the rare year like last year for instance. When there's a very good chance the team is going to be in the tournament. We're playing for seeding. Consider an extra neutral site game, series starting on the road or a one off road game in place of a buy game.
If a team can't be found so be it. I think the scheduling model is fine but some slight variance is justified if there's a team worthy of it. 2-3 less home games a decade.
Anything that can be done to get us out of the 7/10 and 8/9 games on the seed line.
look at a 2 for 1 if it would get us a good series
|