|
hmmm... it seems there is room for interpretation here. If the official that called the initial lane violation felt there was disconcertion, then this applies...
c. When disconcertion by an opponent is followed by a violation by the
free- thrower or a teammate of the free-thrower, only the disconcertion is
penalized and a substitute free throw shall be awarded.
Does disconcertion imply an intentional distraction?
I'm just learning here... certainly no expert.
|
