Originally Posted by Gazoo
21 is a purely arbitrary number, you said it was supported by science. (This is the part where you tell me you never said that, don't disappoint me.)[/B][/U].
|
LOL. You really are the biggest numbskull on this site. Instead of me denying that I said it was supported by science, can you please find it and quote it. Only if your definitions of mistakes and errors in judgement are scientific, then I'd say yes, comparable though, mine isn't my own opinion, it's what they base the law on, yours was strictly an opinion based on what Gazoo does wrong is an error in judgement, what others do wrong that Gazoo never has is unforgivable.