Originally Posted by jack72
So your factual defense is "probably".
|
Are you actually trying to argue something, or are you just interjecting for the sake of interjecting?
My position is that Memphis didn't know and had no way of knowing. None of the facts dispute that.
-Duke offered Rose a scholarship.
-At no point did Duke resend the offer.
-Rose was declared initially eligible by the NCAA
-Rose was declared eligible to play the second semester by both Memphis and the NCAA
-The ETS invalidated Rose's test score AFTER the season
-Memphis admitted they used a player who had his test score invalidated, but did not knowingly break any rules.
-The NCAA agreed that Memphis did not knowingly break any rules. Furthermore, they did not fine Memphis $500 for each game that Rose played in. I think it's safe to assume that the NCAA would not have waived this if they felt Memphis knew he was ineligible.
-The NCAA did not charge Calipari with anything.
So, saying that Memphis knew, or that Calipari knew, or that Duke knew but for some reason never rescinded their offer, cannot be supported with facts. Only suppositions. Some of which are wilder than others.
