Originally Posted by CE80
We actually had more quad 1 opportunities than Nevada. UD 6 and Nevada 5. Same OOC 5 with UD going 0-3 and Nevada going 1-2. We had 3 in conf going 1-2 and Nevada went 1-2. So our quad 1 scheduling was not really different than Nevada. We just didn’t win any OOC.
The bigger difference was quad 2. We only had 3 opportunities going 0-1 OOC and 1-1 in conference. Nevada has 10 going 3-0 OOC but 5-2 in conference. That’s 7 quad 1 opportunities to our 2. That is the big difference. What this tells me more is that we need to be in another conference. We should start a thread about being in another conference. Seriously I wonder how much this year was an anomaly or wasn’t it?
Posted via Mobile Device
|
I think Nevada will be playing at
URI, at Davidson, and at ISU next year, I am guessing that all 3 of those games this year were the start of home and homes. They got 1 q1 opportunity and 2 q2 opportunities there. If they play the standard 16/14, they likely only have 12 q1 and q2 opps, losing all 3 of those opps.
If we go to 15/15 and get 1 more q1 road opp and 1 more q2 home opportunity, we get 11 q1 and q2 opps vs. 15 for Nevada. Whereas it is 9 vs. 15 now.
And FWIW, this year was the 5th toughest schedule we have played in the last 25 years, our sos is normally not this good.