Originally Posted by Schraff01
One of the biggest differences I have seen over the years in comparing Dayton to these other programs is that when a coach leaves they hire from within (especially when you look at X & Butler). This keeps continuity and seems to keep recruits. All the momentum that AM created at Dayton seems to now be lost because they hired from outside and kind of starting all over in hopes that AG is right guy.
|
It's often said that the most important job a CEO has is planning for his succession. I would like to see Neil explain to AG that a very high priority is having at least one assistant that could succeed him (AG).
That's not always possible, of course. But, if it's not even a consideration the chances of it happening become very small. In contrast, if it's always on the minds of Neil and AG the probability rises considerably. AG is an experienced coach......he understands what it takes.
Xavier and Butler are good examples....both UD peers....they've been able to do it. Gonzaga...also a peer....has been lucky to have long term continuity without a coaching change. Villanova has one of the best coaches in the country...and VU is not a stepping stone.
