Originally Posted by Gazoo
Unless AG built a robotic suit that allowed him to control our 6-12 shooting from 3, and somehow created a vudoo doll that made URI go 3-19 at home, then he simply gets credit for doing his job in my book.
|
My two cents. Maybe it was good shooting because the coaching staff scouted
URI's defense, and then came up with a game plan to exploit it and get good, open shots, thus increasing the likelihood of completions.
Also, maybe there was a good defensive game plan. Maybe the staff figured out a way to stop first or second options, forcing a poor shooting URI team to rely on jacking up threes, which they aren't good at.
I agree you certainly need talent, and you win with players performing well, but a good game plan certainly helps.
I voted for Obi.