Originally Posted by Gazoo
Why?
So you're saying if I go to Texas, and Texas provides a horrible environment for learning and no support, I should be punished (with sitting out a year) for transferring to another school that will provide me a better learning environment? This seems counter-intuitive.
It sounds to me like you're providing an argument for any arbitrary rule made by the NCAA.
|
Because schools don't lose APR retention points for athletes who transfer out with a 2.6 GPA or better. I remember when that rule passed. The same people that are always predicting doomsday scenarios were doing it then too.
I'm not going to say that the APR isn't arbitrary in and of itself (although THEY claim that it's not), but that's the reason. That's also the reason that I'm almost 99 percent sure that the required GPA to not have to sit out will be a 2.6.