UDPride Discussion Forums    
     

Go Back   UDPride Discussion Forums

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Advertisement
View Single Post
  #66  
Old 05-20-2017, 09:26 AM
xubrew xubrew is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,202
Thanks: 385
Thanked 2,312 Times in 1,011 Posts
xubrew has a reputation beyond reputexubrew has a reputation beyond reputexubrew has a reputation beyond reputexubrew has a reputation beyond reputexubrew has a reputation beyond reputexubrew has a reputation beyond reputexubrew has a reputation beyond reputexubrew has a reputation beyond reputexubrew has a reputation beyond reputexubrew has a reputation beyond reputexubrew has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by UDFLIES View Post
So UofL's should be coming down? Right?
Posted via Mobile Device
You're confusing technicalities with practicalities. The NCAA is a hyper technical world. UofL is not dealing with an initial eligibility issue where the rules are pretty black and white. They're dealing with a failure to monitor issue. The rules for that typically don't involve vacating wins. The best analogy I can come up with is that Memphis was driving a car without a license, but other than that was breaking no traffic laws. Louisville had a license, but was going 60 in a 25. Those are going to be handled very differently.

Can you name one example where a school used an ineligible player in any sport that did not have to vacate every single game that player appeared in? I can't.

Can you name any failure to monitor cases where teams were not having to vacate wins?? Yes. There are tons of them.

Last edited by xubrew; 05-20-2017 at 09:30 AM..
Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement System V2.6 By   Branden

     
 
Copyright 1996-2012 UDPride.com. All Rights Reserved.