Originally Posted by xubrew
You're confusing technicalities with practicalities. The NCAA is a hyper technical world. UofL is not dealing with an initial eligibility issue where the rules are pretty black and white. They're dealing with a failure to monitor issue. The rules for that typically don't involve vacating wins. The best analogy I can come up with is that Memphis was driving a car without a license, but other than that was breaking no traffic laws. Louisville had a license, but was going 60 in a 25. Those are going to be handled very differently.
Can you name one example where a school used an ineligible player in any sport that did not have to vacate every single game that player appeared in? I can't.
Can you name any failure to monitor cases where teams were not having to vacate wins?? Yes. There are tons of them.
|
No no no, my argument is a UofL coach PAID for strippers/prostitutes for their recruits. Which would make the said recruits ineligible (receiving improper benefits), which would vacate wins.
Posted via Mobile Device