04-11-2018, 08:16 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami Twp.
Posts: 3,342
Thanks: 268
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,038 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by priceg75
i am married to a clemson grad and watched all of clemson's games.
Skara started a number of games and was easily the 6th man. He was on the floor a lot, and was the defensive stopper. Great glue guy if not a big scorer.
He also was deemed ineligible for the first 9 games which caused some initial issues of getting in the flow.
|
Originally Posted by udscott
you seriously cant say that with a straight face can u ?? He averaged 3.3 points a game, 3.3, him being suspended does not have anything to do with his average, don't try and sit there and type and tell us that a guy that was suspended 9 games and scored 3.3 points a game was your 6th man, that is beyond hysterical
john crosby must have been our sixth man
|
Originally Posted by sluflyer
skara was absolutely their 6th man. While 6th man term can be somewhat of a "grey" description/interpretation, it's historically designated to the player not in the traditional starting lineup who logs the most minutes and/or is the first player off the bench. And it's not specifically tied to a player's ppg. Players have different roles, some that are not always transparent in a stat sheet. Skara served as a defensive stopper and logged almost 20 minutes per game, which was 25% more than the next (7th highest) player.
Clemson was also a team whose starting 5 carried a heavy load of offensive production, as every starter averaged double digits and their 6th rated scorer was at 4.0, just .7 points above skara.
Compared to dayton, there wasn't a player outside of the dayton top 5 that averaged more minutes than skara.
With all due respect, the entire context and premise of your post and its justification is either misinformed or uninformed.
|
oh snap
|