UDPride Discussion Forums    
     

Go Back   UDPride Discussion Forums

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Advertisement
View Single Post
  #138  
Old 04-05-2017, 10:17 AM
88flyer 88flyer is offline
1st Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 193
Thanks: 115
Thanked 154 Times in 53 Posts
88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by jack72 View Post
If you let them play and not call all the fouls, which do each official let go and which do they call?

BTW the flagrant call on the big kid was a flagrant call by definition. They can change the rule, but to what standard? Can they say a flagrant must be on purpose. How could a ref judge that to anyone's satisfaction.

The bad call on the flagrant play was the foul on the UNC kid. He never touched the Zag.
So why no flagrant foul when Karnowski got hit in face and poked in the eye the game before? Wasn't even considered, yet was very clear. If you are going to go "by definition", then it needs to be consistent. Players get hit in the head/face every game by accident. Rarely called.

In this case - UNC missed both free throws, so it didn't impact the outcome. I think a few phantom foul calls on Collins were more important to the outcome.
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to 88flyer For This Totally Excellent Post:
CT Flyer (04-05-2017)
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement System V2.6 By   Branden

     
 
Copyright 1996-2012 UDPride.com. All Rights Reserved.