Originally Posted by MNFats
My last post on the topic - since it's slightly off-topic here.
Saying Crutcher is as good or better than MW is biased. Most recruiting services disagree.
|
I feel like if we have a bias it's actually toward McKinley Wright because we built him up in our minds over a long period of time as something really great, whereas we are just starting to do that with Crutcher.
But I am trying to fact check what you are saying here, and I'm not sure it's accurate as most of what I am seeing has them ranked the same at least in terms of stars. Several sites like ESPN don't rank either of them. But of the two sites I know of which compile "composite ranks" so you can compare the grades of multiple scouting services, here is what Verbal Commits and 24/7 Sports has --
VERBAL COMMITS:
Jalen Crutcher: 3 stars composite rank
McKinley Wright: 2.5 stars composite rank
http://www.verbalcommits.com/players/jalen-crutcher
http://www.verbalcommits.com/players/mckinley-wright
24/7 SPORTS
McKinley is composite ranked 3 stars (#222). They have him graded out as an 89/100.
Crutcher is composite ranked 3 stars (#314) They have him graded out as an 86/100.
http://247sports.com/player/jalen-crutcher-92031
http://247sports.com/player/mckinley-wright-80550
