Originally Posted by BeckysTXA
SM said he was approached once about paying a high recruit to come to AZ and that he never agreed to pay the player and the player never came to AZ. I’d say SM just admitted that the black market to pay players is real, but he has never agreed to pay.
Over the last couple days I read a report of a podcast that someone said they talked to Book Richardson and the player during the Dawkins/Sean conversation wasn’t D Ayton but rather Brian Bowen. Then the next day the guy who said it back tracked saying he meant to say that IF he talked to Richardson he could envision being told the player disvussed during the alledged conversation was Bowen and then the date of the conversation wouldn’t be an issue, etc. basically then it would make sense.
Point is no one talking or reporting about this alledged conversation has a transcript or heard the recording if it even exists, so everything is hearsay, not fact. The only person who has spoken that has firsthand knowledge is Sean Miller who has disclosed to AZ he was approached about paying a player. And then those parties agreed to disclose that to the public. I think that was smart.
|
Hearsay can certainly be true and therefor factual. Just because it is hearsay does not mean it is not true. And, this may not be hearsay at all. If the source is someone with personal knowledge of the conversation, it is not hearsay.
