Originally Posted by xubrew
If it were up to me, the rule would be 2.6 across the board for all sports.
|
Why?
So you're saying if I go to Texas, and Texas provides a horrible environment for learning and no support, I should be punished (with sitting out a year) for transferring to another school that will provide me a better learning environment? This seems counter-intuitive.
It sounds to me like you're providing an argument for any arbitrary rule made by the NCAA.
Originally Posted by xubrew
I can't help but think that if the roles were reversed, and they had just proposed implementing the YIR rule for the first time, all the same people who are wringing their hands now would be wringing their hands about how the bigger programs were trying th make it to where the guys who don't get much playing time would be discouraged from transferring to a smaller team so they could play more, and how it was all just another plot to screw over the smaller programs. Some people just find all kinds of reasons to think they're being screwed.
Posted via Mobile Device
|