Originally Posted by m21eagle45
Never said anything about it being a final decision. I said proposed rule. You may need to check your reading comprehension.
|
lol. These kind of posts are hilarious. Especially when m21eagle is the one that completely missed Gazoo's point. Like when the grammar police have a misspelled word in their own post.
Gazoo's point has nothing to do with "final decision" or "proposed rule". He is saying that this rule (which may or may not seem like a big deal) will lead to another rule, which leads to another rule, so on and so on.
I thought he explained his point well with this example: "You're like the person in 1960 who says "expanding this government program won't have any impact on the future attitudes of Americans towards entitlements" and then he explained it poorly with his transgender example and confused everyone, but he is making the same point. He is trying to look "big picture" and how it could affect things in the future, not just look at this one rule.
Change is always incremental and then you look back and all the incremental changes add up to a big change. Sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse.
