UDPride Discussion Forums    
     

Go Back   UDPride Discussion Forums > STEVEN E. YUHAS MEMORIAL LOUNGE > Off-Topic Gibberish

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-2018, 09:43 AM
ud2's Avatar
ud2 ud2 is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,668
Thanks: 4,103
Thanked 3,327 Times in 2,190 Posts
ud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond repute
RFK assassination

This article brings up 2 seemingly unexplained, critical possible discrepancies that I was unaware of.

Makes me wonder if the official explanation is the truth.




1. 13 shots might have been fired, but there were only 8 bullets in Sirhan Sirhan's gun.

2. The fatal shots hit RFK from behind, SS was seemingly always in front of RFK.



http://www.realclearlife.com/history...al-conspiracy/:


Sirhan attacked RFK from the front and was quickly tackled. Theoretically, RFK could have turned away from Sirhan, causing him to be shot from behind. However, Schrade and other witnesses challenge this account—in general, the consensus appears to be that Sirhan fired two (or at most three) shots before getting taken to the ground, at which point he continued firing until he used up all eight shots.

The Shot Count. Analysis of an audio recording of the attack suggests 13 shots fired.

Why This Seemingly Doesn’t Make Sense: But when the eight bullets are all accounted for—three struck RFK and the five wounded took one each—it’s notable that there are photos of investigators examining apparent bullet holes in doors after the shooting.

Particularly since the doors were later destroyed, along with ceiling tiles and over 2,000 photos.

And none of this could be confirmed until 1988, as a good chunk of the evidence was sealed away for 20 years after the crime.

Throw in an internal police document concluding “Kennedy and Weisel [a wounded ABC News producer] bullets not fired from same gun” and in 2012 a witness insisting the FBI “twisted” her account to ignore a second shooter and it’s easy to see why some say important details have either gone missing or been intentionally hidden.

Last edited by ud2; 06-07-2018 at 09:53 AM..
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
  #2  
Old 06-07-2018, 10:32 AM
UACFlyer UACFlyer is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,520
Thanks: 3,215
Thanked 3,784 Times in 2,290 Posts
UACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeUACFlyer has a reputation beyond repute
Conspiracy theories

Originally Posted by ud2 View Post
This article brings up 2 seemingly unexplained, critical possible discrepancies that I was unaware of.

Makes me wonder if the official explanation is the truth.




1. 13 shots might have been fired, but there were only 8 bullets in Sirhan Sirhan's gun.

2. The fatal shots hit RFK from behind, SS was seemingly always in front of RFK.



http://www.realclearlife.com/history...al-conspiracy/:


Sirhan attacked RFK from the front and was quickly tackled. Theoretically, RFK could have turned away from Sirhan, causing him to be shot from behind. However, Schrade and other witnesses challenge this account—in general, the consensus appears to be that Sirhan fired two (or at most three) shots before getting taken to the ground, at which point he continued firing until he used up all eight shots.

The Shot Count. Analysis of an audio recording of the attack suggests 13 shots fired.

Why This Seemingly Doesn’t Make Sense: But when the eight bullets are all accounted for—three struck RFK and the five wounded took one each—it’s notable that there are photos of investigators examining apparent bullet holes in doors after the shooting.

Particularly since the doors were later destroyed, along with ceiling tiles and over 2,000 photos.

And none of this could be confirmed until 1988, as a good chunk of the evidence was sealed away for 20 years after the crime.

Throw in an internal police document concluding “Kennedy and Weisel [a wounded ABC News producer] bullets not fired from same gun” and in 2012 a witness insisting the FBI “twisted” her account to ignore a second shooter and it’s easy to see why some say important details have either gone missing or been intentionally hidden.
There are some seemingly strange aspects to the JFK shooting as well....and they provided the basis for books, movies, endless speculation. But, 99.9% of the time in order to make an alternative explanation fly,...e.g., more than one JFK shooter,...you have to focus on a few apparent discrepancies to make your alternative case while ignoring an overwhelming body of evidence that the event happened as concluded by investigators, e.g., the Warren Commission. Further, you have to buy that a large group of distinguished, trusted people, e.g., the Warren commissioners either were complicit in a coverup or were irresponsible re their duty.

(My wife is sure the Mafia was behind the JFK shooting.)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-07-2018, 10:49 AM
Mich Flyer's Avatar
Mich Flyer Mich Flyer is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,749
Thanks: 1,598
Thanked 1,743 Times in 1,116 Posts
Mich Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeMich Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeMich Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeMich Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeMich Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeMich Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeMich Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeMich Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeMich Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeMich Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeMich Flyer has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by UACFlyer View Post
There are some seemingly strange aspects to the JFK shooting as well....and they provided the basis for books, movies, endless speculation. But, 99.9% of the time in order to make an alternative explanation fly,...e.g., more than one JFK shooter,...you have to focus on a few apparent discrepancies to make your alternative case while ignoring an overwhelming body of evidence that the event happened as concluded by investigators, e.g., the Warren Commission. Further, you have to buy that a large group of distinguished, trusted people, e.g., the Warren commissioners either were complicit in a coverup or were irresponsible re their duty.

(My wife is sure the Mafia was behind the JFK shooting.)
Robert Kennedy's son thinks it was someone other than Sirhan who fired the fatal shot.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2018, 12:38 PM
Buster Goode Buster Goode is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Fernando Valley, CA
Posts: 3,034
Thanks: 1,124
Thanked 1,951 Times in 909 Posts
Buster Goode has a reputation beyond reputeBuster Goode has a reputation beyond reputeBuster Goode has a reputation beyond reputeBuster Goode has a reputation beyond reputeBuster Goode has a reputation beyond reputeBuster Goode has a reputation beyond reputeBuster Goode has a reputation beyond reputeBuster Goode has a reputation beyond reputeBuster Goode has a reputation beyond reputeBuster Goode has a reputation beyond reputeBuster Goode has a reputation beyond repute
Have they questioned Rosey Grier?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2018, 01:24 PM
ClaytonFlyerFan's Avatar
ClaytonFlyerFan ClaytonFlyerFan is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,159
Thanks: 4,851
Thanked 4,799 Times in 1,910 Posts
ClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond repute
How long till Swamp tries to tie this to Trump and his associates?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement System V2.6 By   Branden

     
 
Copyright 1996-2012 UDPride.com. All Rights Reserved.