In the past, I have critical of UD administration for lacking innovation to propel forward. Well, I think Archie demonstrated the innovations he brought to UD.
Here is what I think that Archie brought that was/is new and different.
1)
Recruiting of transfers. Granted this is still a fairly new trend, but UD was not really into this game. Archie recruited 3 transfers and 2 were absolutely critical for the run. Now way, the team goes deep without Sibert and Sanford. One did not work out, but the other two were very, very good.
2)
365 day a year skill development. Archie works every day of the year on basketball skill development. AAU coaches don't work on it so many players are arriving lacking good fundamentals. BG concentrated most of his efforts on rebounding and defense. Important points, but what do you think a measured 365 days system could have done for
Chris Wright? Chris would be a better shooter and ball handler. No doubt in my mind. Look at Devin Oliver. Early in the year, most people did not want to shoot a 3. At the end of the year, he is a leader in 3 point percentage. His form and technique improved dramatically from his sophomore year. Can Archie do this for Kendall and Kyle? If so, look out!
3)
Recruit in Canada and Louisiana. How many players from those areas have played for UD before. Again, critical decision making to look outside of traditional areas for key players.
4)
Rest Players in February. BG would say the players can rest in the off season. His team always had injury practices and the flu. Every year. Classic signs of over work. Jim Crews burned out the St. Louis seniors. Archie's team had fresher legs in the tournament. He tried to keep them mentally and physically fresh. Too often coaches want players to work harder, run harder in season and while losing. Sometimes, the opposite is needed. What does it take to keep players fresh and loose?
5)
Archie uses KenPom alot. Some people don't like data driven coaching. He said he stopped in January when he became too obsessed, But... KenPom showed him the obvious areas of work. UD was 175th in the nation in defense. Archie knew the team had offensive talent, but lacked defensive results. When their defense improved, they won games including close games. I think they finish around 75th in the nation. That defense was critical in all three NCAA tournament wins.
There are probably a couple more that I forgot.
Archie brought some new, clever thinking to UD. In year 3, it paid off well. You could argue that he beat Ohio State and Syracuse that had superior talent. On paper, I would agree, but Archie and the team figured out how to win.
You can argue that these are not innovations, but I would argue that they are big innovations. His approach was different than his predecessors and his results were faster. Some parts of coaching is the same. You have to out score your opponent, play fundamentals, defense, rebound etc...
He impressed UD with his ideas during his job interview. I think you now see why
Tim Wabler hired him and extended him. Tim was able to see this thinking before the public saw it.
I hope this think differently approach continues. You have to be good as well as clever to compete against these rich powerful teams that dominate the NCAA tournament every year. Archie used an innovative formula this year. Stay tuned.