In the 8 teams not making it back to the NCAA this year, I get that the Flyers are an easy pick, even though, who knows, seems they have talent, just not proven. He mentions the coaching, this is what bothers me. If we don't have enough talent or too many changes to make it, the change in coaches have nothing to do with it since only two freshman that AM had coming in didn't show and one is replaced with an active player this season. What I'm saying is it appears that with or without Archie Miller, the Flyers chances are the same this season. So why not focus on what we're missing in players rather than on the outgoing and incoming coaches?