|
|
|
07-20-2017, 08:48 AM
|
General of the Air Force
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,778
Thanks: 5,498
Thanked 6,255 Times in 3,097 Posts
|
|
Nothing else going on. Might as well go back to bashing Archie.
|
07-20-2017, 09:40 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 14,790
Thanks: 10,098
Thanked 10,503 Times in 4,705 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by Buckleyma
Dallasflyer: Archie could have a beer with Bucky Bockhorn in Bloomington Indiana, as well! We'll, as a fanbase, travel to Bloomington for the game. Although, the last time that I watched a game in their arena, I felt physically threatened by how steep the seating was positioned. It was so steep that i was afraid to stand up and go get a cold beverage. I just sat in my seat clutching the chair handles wondering if there was a seat belt or some type of safety harness for us old folks who aren't as stable on our feet as we used to be.
Posted via Mobile Device
|
I felt the exact same trepidation in St John Arena in '61 when our C-ville coach took us there for a game. Never have really experienced anything that steep since. Of course those were the cheap seats, but I thought they should have paid US to sit there. I was white knuckle in the seat the whole game.
|
07-20-2017, 03:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bluffton, SC
Posts: 22,259
Thanks: 17,641
Thanked 10,171 Times in 5,899 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by Buckleyma
Dallasflyer: Archie could have a beer with Bucky Bockhorn in Bloomington Indiana, as well! We'll, as a fanbase, travel to Bloomington for the game. Although, the last time that I watched a game in their arena, I felt physically threatened by how steep the seating was positioned. It was so steep that i was afraid to stand up and go get a cold beverage. I just sat in my seat clutching the chair handles wondering if there was a seat belt or some type of safety harness for us old folks who aren't as stable on our feet as we used to be.
Posted via Mobile Device
|
Amen on the steepness issue. Great atmosphere, but that upper deck is roller coaster without a seat belt scary.
Posted via Mobile Device
|
07-20-2017, 03:41 PM
|
|
General of the Air Force
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,056
Thanks: 8,831
Thanked 8,589 Times in 3,714 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by San Diego Flyer
I felt the exact same trepidation in St John Arena .
|
Originally Posted by Buckleyma
Dallasflyer: Archie could have a beer with Bucky Bockhorn in Bloomington Indiana, as well! We'll, as a fanbase, travel to Bloomington for the game. Although, the last time that I watched a game in their arena, I felt physically threatened by how steep the seating was positioned. It was so steep that i was afraid to stand up and go get a cold beverage. I just sat in my seat clutching the chair handles wondering if there was a seat belt or some type of safety harness for us old folks who aren't as stable on our feet as we used to be.
Posted via Mobile Device
|
Originally Posted by jack72
Amen on the steepness issue. Great atmosphere, but that upper deck is roller coaster without a seat belt scary.
Posted via Mobile Device
|
I have been to both, and neither compared with the Aud in Buffalo New York where I went to watch a few Sabres hockey games. They claimed it was the steepest seats in all of sports. My arm still has hand prints from my wifes death grip on me. Even after multiple adult beverages, I still felt like I was going to fall forward out of me seat watching the game, but was heck of a view looking down on the ice. It is a shame they tore the building down.
|
Mad Props to ClaytonFlyerFan For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-20-2017, 08:21 PM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,632
Thanks: 1,342
Thanked 1,396 Times in 713 Posts
|
|
They Need The Money....
Originally Posted by jack72
OSU only plays buy games in their arena, unless it is a Big5 team.
|
Right, because they desperately need the money to keep the athletic department afloat. Or, maybe there is another reason. Call me a cynic.
|
07-23-2017, 10:09 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,272
Thanks: 327
Thanked 3,077 Times in 1,230 Posts
|
|
Would have been nice if Sean would have done this for Archie when he was at UD: Report: Miller brothers at Arizona, Indiana schedule three-year series
http://arizonasports.com/story/11849...hedule-series/
|
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to NCkevi For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 12:22 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,562
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,172 Times in 4,202 Posts
|
|
Archie and OSU hc Holtmann are both earning more than Sean at Arizona. Very strange.
https://www.azdesertswarm.com/basket...contract-money:
Arizona basketball: Archie Miller to earn higher salary than Sean Miller at Indiana
According to the Indy Star, Archie’s contract at IU, which runs through March 2024, is worth up to $24 million and will pay him an average of $3.35 million per year and could pass the $4 million mark after incentives.
Sean’s contract at Arizona, which was extended in February, currently pays him about $2.6 million and is set to increase to at least $2.9 million by 2020.
In total, Archie is the eighth-highest paid coach in college basketball among those that reached the NCAA Tournament last year, per USA Today.
While Sean is the highest paid public employee in the state of Arizona, it’s clear that he could make more money elsewhere, which is why some fear he could leave Tucson eventually.
However, Sean was not interested in the Ohio State job this offseason, and its new coach, Chris Holtmann, makes more than Sean now too, so money evidently isn’t his No. 1 priority.
|
07-24-2017, 05:37 AM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,711
Thanks: 356
Thanked 419 Times in 304 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by ud2
Archie and OSU hc Holtmann are both earning more than Sean at Arizona. Very strange.
https://www.azdesertswarm.com/basket...contract-money:
Arizona basketball: Archie Miller to earn higher salary than Sean Miller at Indiana
According to the Indy Star, Archie’s contract at IU, which runs through March 2024, is worth up to $24 million and will pay him an average of $3.35 million per year and could pass the $4 million mark after incentives.
Sean’s contract at Arizona, which was extended in February, currently pays him about $2.6 million and is set to increase to at least $2.9 million by 2020.
In total, Archie is the eighth-highest paid coach in college basketball among those that reached the NCAA Tournament last year, per USA Today.
While Sean is the highest paid public employee in the state of Arizona, it’s clear that he could make more money elsewhere, which is why some fear he could leave Tucson eventually.
However, Sean was not interested in the Ohio State job this offseason, and its new coach, Chris Holtmann, makes more than Sean now too, so money evidently isn’t his No. 1 priority.
|
2016 Arizona payed Miller 4.9 mill. Now money could be deferred in different ways because of taxes. Who knows how these contracts are setup
|
07-24-2017, 08:48 AM
|
General of the Air Force
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,778
Thanks: 5,498
Thanked 6,255 Times in 3,097 Posts
|
|
Sean has the best gig in college basketball.
|
Mad Props to CE80 For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 11:54 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,933
Thanks: 1,610
Thanked 2,827 Times in 1,551 Posts
|
|
That might be, but I think that despite our disappointment with his departure, Archie is a better coach.
|
07-24-2017, 11:56 AM
|
|
General of the Air Force
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Suburbs of Detroit
Posts: 9,758
Thanks: 218
Thanked 10,115 Times in 2,611 Posts
|
|
David JablonskiVerified account @DavidPJablonski 1m1 minute ago
Big smiles everyone! The Dayton men's basketball schedule is coming out today (except for Charleston matchups).
|
Mad Props to lhsgolf19 For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 12:37 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,592
Thanks: 1,838
Thanked 2,451 Times in 1,244 Posts
|
|
https://twitter.com/DaytonMBB/status/889523218448609280
Somebody should tell whoever created the graphic that Mississippi St. is located in Starkville and not the town of "Mississippi State"
|
Mad Props to C-time For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 01:14 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,410
Thanks: 870
Thanked 6,302 Times in 3,005 Posts
|
|
|
Mad Props to Sea Bass For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 01:32 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,616
Thanks: 3,383
Thanked 3,108 Times in 1,418 Posts
|
|
A whole lot of Blah... The game at SMC will be huge. Steal that one on the road and our schedule looks that much better. Lose that one and we have to beat Auburn and MSU.
|
Mad Props to m21eagle45 For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 01:34 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,784
Thanks: 140
Thanked 1,145 Times in 598 Posts
|
|
It's actually correct. Mississippi State is mostly located outside of Starkville.
Humphrey Coliseum has a Mississippi State, MS mailing address.
http://www.humphreycoliseum.msstate.edu/
|
Mad Props to bcross For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 01:48 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,592
Thanks: 1,838
Thanked 2,451 Times in 1,244 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by bcross
It's actually correct. Mississippi State is mostly located outside of Starkville.
Humphrey Coliseum has a Mississippi State, MS mailing address.
http://www.humphreycoliseum.msstate.edu/
|
Well based on that I guess they're technically correct based upon the mailing address, but has anyone actually ever said Mississippi State University is located in Mississippi State, Mississippi? The answer is no. It's Starkville or Starkvegas!
|
07-24-2017, 01:57 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,756
Thanks: 677
Thanked 4,342 Times in 2,135 Posts
|
|
Umm.. I think somebody just did...
|
07-24-2017, 02:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 14,790
Thanks: 10,098
Thanked 10,503 Times in 4,705 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by TommyGola
That might be, but I think that despite our disappointment with his departure, Archie is a better coach.
|
I agree and also there are precious few coaches who could have pulled off what Arch did in our short-handed season. He set himself apart in that miracle season.
|
07-24-2017, 02:55 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,592
Thanks: 1,838
Thanked 2,451 Times in 1,244 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by Medford
Umm.. I think somebody just did...
|
Come on Medford. You know what I mean.
In a normal discussion of Mississippi St 99% of people would say it's in Starkville. Sure bcross looked up the technical address but I highly doubt him or anyone else would have ever thought there was an actual town/address of Mississippi State, Misssissippi unless they went to school there and had to write that down as their address while there or have taken a class on Mississippi geography.
And I bet Brent Musburger never came on the air saying "You are looking live at Davis Wade Stadium in Mississippi State, Mississippi". He would say "You are looking live at Davis Wade Stadium in Starkville, Mississippi"
|
07-24-2017, 02:56 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,485
Thanks: 8,460
Thanked 6,618 Times in 2,467 Posts
|
|
|
Mad Props to Lifelong Flyer Fan For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 03:28 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Miamisburg OH
Posts: 3,711
Thanks: 2,162
Thanked 2,118 Times in 1,054 Posts
|
|
Impressive AG Comments
AG is off to a good start with his statement of context for the upcoming season. His comments are clear concise and accurate.
|
07-24-2017, 03:31 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 655
Thanked 3,699 Times in 1,668 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by C-time
And I bet Brent Musburger never came on the air saying "You are looking live at Davis Wade Stadium in Mississippi State, Mississippi". He would say "You are looking live at Davis Wade Stadium in Starkville, Mississippi"
|
What time is the kickoff? Depending on how many Brent has put down, geographic confusion is well within the realm of possibility.
|
3 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to DallasFlyer For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 03:44 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 655
Thanked 3,699 Times in 1,668 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by m21eagle45
A whole lot of Blah... The game at SMC will be huge. Steal that one on the road and our schedule looks that much better. Lose that one and we have to beat Auburn and MSU.
|
I find the fact that Dayton is playing the John Groce-led Akron Zips and the Ron Hunter-led Georgia State Panthers pretty funny. Both those guys were people that Dayton officials reportedly were in contact with regarding the head coaching position when Miller left. They didn't get the job obviously, but since we already had their phone numbers, UD just went ahead and scheduled them. "Sorry you didn't get the job, but we're pleased to offer you a consolation prize in which you will get to coach a game at the arena!"
|
07-24-2017, 03:53 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,784
Thanks: 140
Thanked 1,145 Times in 598 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by DallasFlyer
I find the fact that Dayton is playing the John Groce-led Akron Zips and the Ron Hunter-led Georgia State Panthers pretty funny. Both those guys were people that Dayton officials reportedly were in contact with regarding the head coaching position when Miller left. They didn't get the job obviously, but since we already had their phone numbers, UD just went ahead and scheduled them. "Sorry you didn't get the job, but we're pleased to offer you a consolation prize in which you will get to coach a game at the arena!"
|
James Whitford at Ball State is another one.
|
Mad Props to bcross For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 04:04 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 655
Thanked 3,699 Times in 1,668 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by bcross
James Whitford at Ball State is another one.
|
Indeed! I had skipped down to the part of the DDN article that lists out all the non con opponents, not realizing they put the home opener in the first paragraph. So I totally missed that one. Anyway, so Akron and Ball State are not part of a series? Those are pretty good gets.
|
07-24-2017, 04:05 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,784
Thanks: 140
Thanked 1,145 Times in 598 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by C-time
In a normal discussion of Mississippi St 99% of people would say it's in Starkville. Sure bcross looked up the technical address but I highly doubt him or anyone else would have ever thought there was an actual town/address of Mississippi State, Misssissippi unless they went to school there and had to write that down as their address while there or have taken a class on Mississippi geography.
|
I absolutely looked it up and only did so because I saw someone mention it on twitter. Learned something new today.
|
07-24-2017, 04:42 PM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 2,990
Thanks: 1,012
Thanked 1,772 Times in 935 Posts
|
|
Hard to find it in list format and it took me several hours before I realized Ball St. was opener. I'll try to save others from this:
Ball State
Charleston (N)
Charleston (N)
Charleston (N)
Akron
Auburn
@Miss. St.
TN Tech
Penn
Georgia St.
@St. Mary's
Wagner
I like the Akron and Georgia State games a lot.
|
Mad Props to hawkoooo For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 05:50 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,270
Thanks: 2,337
Thanked 3,923 Times in 2,155 Posts
|
|
Wasn't something in the DDN reported saying that Archie didn't want to play Sean?
|
07-24-2017, 06:05 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,562
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,172 Times in 4,202 Posts
|
|
He seems to be expecting this year's team to be worse than last year, I guess that explains the weaker schedule this year. Only 1 "tougher/bigger name" non-con home game this year, Auburn. Last year we had Vanderbilt and SMC at home. Sigh.
|
07-24-2017, 06:23 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,270
Thanks: 2,337
Thanked 3,923 Times in 2,155 Posts
|
|
On paper I really like this schedule. At first glance it doesn't seem like any of the buy games are going to sub 300 RPI games like VMI was last year.
Akron and Ball St are two good buy games. BSU brings back a guard, Tayler Persons, who was second team all MAC and probably has a good shot at making first team this year along with some other guys who logged major minutes. Akron lost some folks in the coaching transition but got a good grad transfer at guard from Oregon St and have one of the better young guards in the MAC in Jimond Ivey. Both of them I would expect to be in the top half of their divisions in the MAC.
Georgia State is projected 138 in the top 144 preview and a top of the table team in the Sun Belt
http://www.collegesportsmadness.com/article/14857
Auburn hasn't been good since Bruce Pearl got there but there's a good chance the talent he's accumulated over the past couple years starts paying dividends.
Penn brings back 3 of it's top 4 scorers from a team that finished 4th in the Ivy including a freshman who was second team All-Ivy.
Wagner and Tennessee Tech on paper look better than most SWAC/MEAC teams
|
3 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to OSU Flyer For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 06:30 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,130
Thanks: 1,961
Thanked 2,464 Times in 1,288 Posts
|
|
I believe he has a realistic outlook for the season. Four players gone, not a lot of experience returning, lots of first year players. It will be interesting to see this team grow as the season progresses. He sure will have an opportunity to put his mark on this team.
|
07-24-2017, 07:25 PM
|
|
General of the Air Force
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,056
Thanks: 8,831
Thanked 8,589 Times in 3,714 Posts
|
|
Considering the current scheduling model for UD, the lack of interest by big schools to schedule home and home games, the unknowns with a new coach and losing 4 seniors, etc......
I have to say, I give the Flyer Athletic department an A with this schedule if all our opponents live up to their on paper expectations.
|
7 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to ClaytonFlyerFan For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-24-2017, 07:56 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,562
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,172 Times in 4,202 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by ClaytonFlyerFan
Considering the current scheduling model for UD, the lack of interest by big schools to schedule home and home games, the unknowns with a new coach and losing 4 seniors, etc......
I have to say, I give the Flyer Athletic department an A with this schedule if all our opponents live up to their on paper expectations.
|
This is the weakest schedule in years.
We have played 7 tougher opponents in the non-con for the last several years, 2 home and 5 away/neutral, this year it is 6...1 home and 5 away/neutral.
And last year we had 4 seniors and had 7 good games. The stuff about nobody wanting to play us is pure garbage.
If anything, it should have been easier to get good games this year.
Last edited by ud2; 07-24-2017 at 08:05 PM..
|
07-24-2017, 09:08 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,270
Thanks: 2,337
Thanked 3,923 Times in 2,155 Posts
|
|
The Charleston Classic is the weakest exempt tourney we've played in that I can remember
Mississippi State is probably comparable to Alabama last year
St. Mary's is the same
Auburn could very well end up being better than Vanderbilt
No VMI or D2 on the schedule
|
Mad Props to OSU Flyer For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-25-2017, 09:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 14,790
Thanks: 10,098
Thanked 10,503 Times in 4,705 Posts
|
|
I think our SOS fits the lack of maturity and complexities of our squad this year. Anthony has his hands full and will have really earned his keep if we make the postseason NCAA field.
That said, yes we could have a good record but fall short on RPI and SOS this season. Personally I can't wait for us to get started and see what this year's squad does.
|
07-25-2017, 10:14 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,822
Thanks: 2,643
Thanked 2,702 Times in 1,285 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by ud2
This is the weakest schedule in years.
We have played 7 tougher opponents in the non-con for the last several years, 2 home and 5 away/neutral, this year it is 6...1 home and 5 away/neutral.
And last year we had 4 seniors and had 7 good games. The stuff about nobody wanting to play us is pure garbage.
If anything, it should have been easier to get good games this year.
|
Agree.
4 straight tourney runs...self proclaimed "one of the best venues in college basketball".
This schedule is an epic fail.
|
07-25-2017, 10:16 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,756
Thanks: 677
Thanked 4,342 Times in 2,135 Posts
|
|
I think a good record will lead to a good RPI/SOS based upon that schedule; there are few, if any, real stinkers (ie VMI), however it likely won't lead to many top 50 type wins that seem to be more key in an NCAA selection bid.
Given the big roster turnover both in personal and in coaching, the injuries to Miller, Mikesell and now Kostas, a lack of any sort of establish PG, etc.. A schedule with fewer high profile games but less RPI drags is probably what the doctor ordered. If I've learned anything over the years, it is that we should trust UD's scheduling philosophy. They seemingly get it "right" most seasons, striking a balance b/w a schedule that provides both revenue thru home games and an NCAA tournament profile when successful on the court.
|
3 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to Medford For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-25-2017, 10:25 AM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 2,990
Thanks: 1,012
Thanked 1,772 Times in 935 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by OSU Flyer
The Charleston Classic is the weakest exempt tourney we've played in that I can remember
Mississippi State is probably comparable to Alabama last year
St. Mary's is the same
Auburn could very well end up being better than Vanderbilt
No VMI or D2 on the schedule
|
Shhhhh. These facts don't fit the narrative. Nothing to see here...
|
07-25-2017, 12:51 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,562
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,172 Times in 4,202 Posts
|
|
8 out of the last 9 years, UD has played 7 or 8 tougher games in the OOC if you include the Miami of Ohio home and home series games at UD as a tougher game.
But, we played only 6 tougher OOC games in 2015-2016, and everything worked out fine that year: we got a 7 seed.
It just feels like this schedule features a bit of backsliding.
It just feels like, with this schedule, there is less margin for error, and I just think that the selection committee does not really punish you for losing some of your tougher games if you play a tougher schedule.
Last edited by ud2; 07-25-2017 at 12:53 PM..
|
07-25-2017, 01:38 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,593
Thanks: 3,396
Thanked 6,634 Times in 3,033 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by ud2
We have played 7 tougher opponents in the non-con for the last several years, 2 home and 5 away/neutral, this year it is 6...1 home and 5 away/neutral.
|
Originally Posted by ud2
8 out of the last 9 years, UD has played 7 or 8 tougher games in the OOC if you include the Miami of Ohio home and home series games at UD as a tougher game.
But, we played only 6 tougher OOC games in 2015-2016, and everything worked out fine that year: we got a 7 seed.
|
This schedule will be a little weaker than normal due to the exempt tourney being weaker. But your other statements are way off. I don't see how in the world you can call Miami a big game. Take Miami out and your 8 out of the last 9 years statement is not true. In 14-15 we played only 6 "tougher" games not including Miami. The same holds true for other seasons as well. In 10-11 we played even fewer "tougher" games. But if you want to include Miami as a tough game then you would have to include Akron and Ball State this season. You can't have it both ways. Including Akron and Ball State would give UD eight "tougher" games this season. So, either way you look at it, your statements about the number of "tougher" games are incorrect. I know you love to bash UD's schedules every year, but at least get your facts straight.
|
10 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to longtimefan For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-25-2017, 03:45 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,592
Thanks: 1,838
Thanked 2,451 Times in 1,244 Posts
|
|
And UD has now fixed the schedule and they have UD playing in Starkville, Mississippi as it should be.
https://twitter.com/DaytonMBB/status/889845151740424192
|
07-25-2017, 05:34 PM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Springboro
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 2,219
Thanked 2,767 Times in 1,133 Posts
|
|
UD2 not only never likes the schedule, he also disliked the AG hire. So, his purpose is two fold: first, his annual complaint about the schedule but the second is him setting up, in his mind atleast, that the schedule is very weak. He then, again in his mind, can justify any losses as part of his larger crusade to bash the AG hire.
If you think you got tired of his schedule rants, you just wait. You ain't seen nothing yet...
|
07-25-2017, 05:45 PM
|
1st Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 131
Thanks: 37
Thanked 84 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
UD will play Hofstra first round of the Charleston Classic per Jon Rothstein tweet:
2017 Charleston Classic bracket, per sources: Clemson/Ohio, Dayton/Hofstra, Temple/Old Dominion, Auburn/Indiana State.
Posted via Mobile Device
|
4 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to Bigtimeflyersguy For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-25-2017, 07:39 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,270
Thanks: 2,337
Thanked 3,923 Times in 2,155 Posts
|
|
Do I read this correctly that we play the winner of Ohio/Clemson in round 2? (assuming we win)
|
07-25-2017, 08:16 PM
|
|
General of the Air Force
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Suburbs of Detroit
Posts: 9,758
Thanks: 218
Thanked 10,115 Times in 2,611 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by OSU Flyer
Do I read this correctly that we play the winner of Ohio/Clemson in round 2? (assuming we win)
|
Looks like it
|
07-26-2017, 09:40 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,562
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,172 Times in 4,202 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by springborofan
UD2 not only never likes the schedule, he also disliked the AG hire. So, his purpose is two fold: first, his annual complaint about the schedule but the second is him setting up, in his mind atleast, that the schedule is very weak. He then, again in his mind, can justify any losses as part of his larger crusade to bash the AG hire.
If you think you got tired of his schedule rants, you just wait. You ain't seen nothing yet...
|
Yes, I am guilty as charged. I am sorry if some of my comments about AG's hiring upset some people. I still do not like the hire, but I hope that I am proven wrong.
And I am not planning on making a lot of criticism of AG during his first 3 years. But, I do feel like making the NCAAT by his 3rd year is a very reasonable expectation.
And I also feel like AG should be expected to advance the program, as in doing as well as or better than Archie.
That was why I was critical of BG: it took him too long to get UD back to the NCAAT. Archie got UD back to the NCAAT by his 3rd year. Outside of BG's 1st year, I feel like BG should have also been able to get UD back to the NCAAT by his 3rd year, but, it took BG until his 6th year to get UD back to the NCAAT. That was much too long of a wait IMO.
I have never liked the scheduling model, I think that it is not ambitious enough. IMO, it is not enough to be just focused on making the NCAAT every year, UD should be focused on growing the program and getting better seeds in the NCAAT, and the scheduling model makes achieving that objective pretty difficult IMO. It is going to be hard for UD to ever consistently advance past the round of 32 with our scheduling model. Prior to the NCAAT, Archie won 26, 24, and 23 games over his last 3 years, and all we got was an 11, 7, and 7 seed.
In about the last 30 years, UD has had the following seeds: 10, 9, 12, 11, 4, 10, 11, 11, 11, 7, and 7. I think we should be expect better than that. Look at VCU, Butler, Creighton, Xavier, and Temple, they all have gotten much better seeds than that over that time, and they all schedule more ambitiously than UD does.
This year's schedule feels like UD has already written off any hopes for the NCAAT this season, and that upsets me because schools like VCU, Butler, Creighton, and Temple and Xavier, when those 2 were in the A10, don't do things like that.
I feel like UD needs to do a better job of keeping up with its peers.
At those schools, they don't say "Hello, Mr. New Head Coach, welcome to XYZ University. We are pretty much going to give you a pass on your first year here, in terms of making the NCAAT." No, they pretty much expect the new head coach to hit the ground running in his first year. Will Wade at VCU, Thad Matta at X, and Chris Mack at X all made the NCAAT in their first year.
UD is red hot right now, it seems reasonable IMO, for AG to be able to be continue that hot streak in his first year. If Archie were still here, I would be looking at this year as a NCAAT year.
|
Mad Props to ud2 For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-26-2017, 10:20 AM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,784
Thanks: 140
Thanked 1,145 Times in 598 Posts
|
|
Schedule looks very similar to previous years. I'd be surprised by this reaction if it didn't happen every single year.
|
4 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to bcross For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-26-2017, 10:48 AM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,130
Thanks: 1,961
Thanked 2,464 Times in 1,288 Posts
|
|
I'm confused ud2, first you say you are willing to give AG a two year pass and have a reasonable expectation of the Dance in his third year, then you rail against the program and AG for not making the Dance in his first year. which is it? I also believe UD has done a good job of scheduling, mixing a strong RPI non-con with a so-so conference. Over time it was the conference play that sidelined us not the OOC, until a couple of years ago we were a middle of the pack A-10 team, kudos to AM for changing that. This was going to be a very interesting year regardless of who was coach. We lost a lot, and have a bunch of unproven players. AG will have a great opportunity to put his stamp on the program, we may struggle a bit at the start but could be very good come conference time.
Last edited by UD62; 07-26-2017 at 10:56 AM..
|
Mad Props to UD62 For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-26-2017, 12:29 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,270
Thanks: 2,337
Thanked 3,923 Times in 2,155 Posts
|
|
I was expecting a worse slate of buy games. I was expecting more VMI/SWAC/MEAC caliber games. Very pleasantly surprised that Akron, Ball St and Georgia St were on the schedule. The competition to get games like this and Winthrop/East Tennessee St last year is getting more fierce.
I posted an article in here or one of the other threads said that said P5 schools are getting more strategic about getting quality opponents for buy games versus the old days of taking anyone. The Missouri Valley Conference commissioner said they had been squeezed out of good buy games as a result of this and it's really set back the league.
|
Mad Props to OSU Flyer For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-26-2017, 12:38 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,270
Thanks: 2,337
Thanked 3,923 Times in 2,155 Posts
|
|
to piggyback off of UD2's thinking, I think we have to string together great years to up the caliber of teams that'll play H/Hs with us
If you look at Wichita, Gonzaga, Creighton, Butler, Xavier, VCU the doors really opened scheduling wise when they strung together a long period success often across multiple coaches before the doors opened on better H/H series
If we hopefully string together 6-7 straight tourney appearances then a lot more doors will open
|
07-26-2017, 12:53 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 617
Thanks: 1,079
Thanked 586 Times in 259 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by OSU Flyer
to piggyback off of UD2's thinking, I think we have to string together great years to up the caliber of teams that'll play H/Hs with us
If you look at Wichita, Gonzaga, Creighton, Butler, Xavier, VCU the doors really opened scheduling wise when they strung together a long period success often across multiple coaches before the doors opened on better H/H series
If we hopefully string together 6-7 straight tourney appearances then a lot more doors will open
|
Not a comment on this year's schedule, but people used to say 3-4 tourney appearances in a row to get good H/H. Now we have 4 and you are saying 6-7! How many teams have been to the tournament 7 years in a row? Figgy? If we get to 7 straight will we say we have to get 9-10 visits in a row before good teams will play at UD?
|
07-26-2017, 12:59 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 617
Thanks: 1,079
Thanked 586 Times in 259 Posts
|
|
I looked up the answer to my own question.
There are currently 8 teams that have been to 7 straight tournaments.
Kansas
Duke
MSU
Gonzaga
Wisconsin
VCU
Cincy
NC
Seems like a high standard if that is what it will take to get good H/H series. But with the current way the Power 5 teams schedule, it is probably true that you basically have to become Gonzaga before they will schedule you.
|
07-26-2017, 06:56 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,242
Thanks: 66
Thanked 3,342 Times in 1,988 Posts
|
|
To me, at a glance, the quality of the exempt tourney looks weaker than the typical event.
The rest of the non conference schedule has no names that jump out. But the top to bottom level seems better than typical. Not out and out consistently bad teams. No VMI types.
I call it about a push. I don't think there are any one or two wins that will seal a bid with a decent record. As always, a bid is determined by finishing in the top 4 of the A10, or winning the A10 tourney.
Given the experience on the roster and the likely bumpy beginnings, I think the schedule is about right.
|
Mad Props to UDDoug For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-27-2017, 10:42 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,134
Thanks: 15
Thanked 614 Times in 351 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by UDDoug
To me, at a glance, the quality of the exempt tourney looks weaker than the typical event.
The rest of the non conference schedule has no names that jump out. But the top to bottom level seems better than typical. Not out and out consistently bad teams. No VMI types.
I call it about a push. I don't think there are any one or two wins that will seal a bid with a decent record. As always, a bid is determined by finishing in the top 4 of the A10, or winning the A10 tourney.
Given the experience on the roster and the likely bumpy beginnings, I think the schedule is about right.
|
UDDoug: i concur with you. Grant is wise to not push his luck with a super competitive schedule with some big names this year. Grant is a new coach with new staff, new environment, new defense system, new offense system, large number of new players, etc. Grant is wise to not push this team too early. It's going to take some time. We'll need to build confidence, early. The A10 schedule will be tough enough. A roster without newcomers of Miller, Williams, Cunningham, Davis and Crosby will be challenged. The newcomers have got to give us a minimum of two starters. That is, i believe, at least, two of the new guys need to punch their ticket into the starting line-up. This year is a great opportunity for a new guy to get playing time unlike other programs or Dayton in other years. I propose that if two of the following are starters by A10 conference play then we will make it to the NCAA. That's my prediction. Two of the following: Kostas, Pierce, Svoboda or Crutcher. Otherwise, we are headed for the NIT, at best or more likely the CBI / CIT / V16.
Posted via Mobile Device
|
07-27-2017, 10:45 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,270
Thanks: 2,337
Thanked 3,923 Times in 2,155 Posts
|
|
I think Ball State is going to be a test off the bat. Can't sleep walk
https://www.midmajormadness.com/2017...-persons-akron
|
Mad Props to OSU Flyer For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
07-27-2017, 11:08 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,756
Thanks: 677
Thanked 4,342 Times in 2,135 Posts
|
|
For anybody that is not in the Nike Classic, or whatever that event is called, they are probably also saying, man this exempt tournament looks worse than usual this year.
That Field(s) included Arkansas, Butler, UConn, Duke, Florida, Georgetown, Gonzaga, Mich St, North Carolina, Ohio St, Oklahoma, Oregon, Portland, Portland St, Stanford and Texas.
14 of those 16 would automatically spice up any event, and has created a waterfall weakening everything else.
|
07-27-2017, 11:13 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,270
Thanks: 2,337
Thanked 3,923 Times in 2,155 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by Medford
For anybody that is not in the Nike Classic, or whatever that event is called, they are probably also saying, man this exempt tournament looks worse than usual this year.
That Field(s) included Arkansas, Butler, UConn, Duke, Florida, Georgetown, Gonzaga, Mich St, North Carolina, Ohio St, Oklahoma, Oregon, Portland, Portland St, Stanford and Texas.
14 of those 16 would automatically spice up any event, and has created a waterfall weakening everything else.
|
The Phil Knight 80
this is a list of the exempt tourneys this year. Outside of Maui and Battle for Atlantis none of the other events look great
https://www.bloggingthebracket.com/2...s-thanksgiving
|
07-27-2017, 11:20 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,593
Thanks: 3,396
Thanked 6,634 Times in 3,033 Posts
|
|
Akron is no pushover either. They have won 27 and 26 games the last two seasons. They may have lost some starters, but so did we, and it looks like John Groce is reloading quickly. Overall, our buy games this season are pretty good.
|
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to longtimefan For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
08-01-2017, 11:32 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,562
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,172 Times in 4,202 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by bcross
Schedule looks very similar to previous years. I'd be surprised by this reaction if it didn't happen every single year.
|
I will give you 2015-2016, where we played a similar schedule.
But no...not similar...weaker this year...last year we had 5 a/n games along with Vanderbilt and SMC at home.
2014-2015...same thing 5 a/n along with GT and Ole Miss at home.
2013-2014...again 5 a/n...USC and Murray State(2 for 1 contract)at home
2012-2013...5 a/n...Miami and Illinois State at home as part of home and home contracts
And then the A10 years where we did sometimes play 6 a/n along with 3 tougher home games that were part of home and home contracts, due to the 16 game league schedule, instead of 18 league games.
|
08-01-2017, 11:41 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,562
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,172 Times in 4,202 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by UD62
I'm confused ud2, first you say you are willing to give AG a two year pass and have a reasonable expectation of the Dance in his third year, then you rail against the program and AG for not making the Dance in his first year. which is it? I also believe UD has done a good job of scheduling, mixing a strong RPI non-con with a so-so conference. Over time it was the conference play that sidelined us not the OOC, until a couple of years ago we were a middle of the pack A-10 team, kudos to AM for changing that. This was going to be a very interesting year regardless of who was coach. We lost a lot, and have a bunch of unproven players. AG will have a great opportunity to put his stamp on the program, we may struggle a bit at the start but could be very good come conference time.
|
I am railing against the schedule. Why are we going backwards with scheduling this year? We could not find one more good home and home series this year? What changed vs. last year?
Last year, we had Vandy and SMC at home, this year just Auburn at home. Why?
What good does it do to weaken the schedule? We now may have to win more games to make the NCAAT. It is somewhat of a zero-sum game: if you weaken the schedule, then you have to win more games to make the NCAAT.
Last edited by ud2; 08-01-2017 at 11:45 AM..
|
08-01-2017, 11:48 AM
|
|
I Am A Statistical God
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Riverside, Ohio
Posts: 5,511
Thanks: 4,692
Thanked 6,171 Times in 2,321 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by ud2
Last year, we had Vandy and SMC at home, this year just Auburn at home. Why?
|
Is it even possible that there are any answers to this question that you will find acceptable?
|
Mad Props to Figgie123 For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
08-01-2017, 11:55 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,593
Thanks: 3,396
Thanked 6,634 Times in 3,033 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by ud2
I will give you 2015-2016, where we played a similar schedule.
But no...not similar...weaker this year...last year we had 5 a/n games along with Vanderbilt and SMC at home.
2014-2015...same thing 5 a/n along with GT and Ole Miss at home.
2013-2014...again 5 a/n...USC and Murray State(2 for 1 contract)at home
2012-2013...5 a/n...Miami and Illinois State at home as part of home and home contracts
And then the A10 years where we did sometimes play 6 a/n along with 3 tougher home games that were part of home and home contracts, due to the 16 game league schedule, instead of 18 league games.
|
You are again counting Miami as a "tougher" game. Can't do that unless you count Ball State and Akron this year. So your reasoning is totally off base.
|
08-01-2017, 11:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,562
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,172 Times in 4,202 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by longtimefan
This schedule will be a little weaker than normal due to the exempt tourney being weaker. But your other statements are way off. I don't see how in the world you can call Miami a big game. Take Miami out and your 8 out of the last 9 years statement is not true. In 14-15 we played only 6 "tougher" games not including Miami. The same holds true for other seasons as well. In 10-11 we played even fewer "tougher" games. But if you want to include Miami as a tough game then you would have to include Akron and Ball State this season. You can't have it both ways. Including Akron and Ball State would give UD eight "tougher" games this season. So, either way you look at it, your statements about the number of "tougher" games are incorrect. I know you love to bash UD's schedules every year, but at least get your facts straight.
|
No, I totally disagree.
The Miami at UD games were part of home and home contracts. UD was locked into those games at UD due to the home and home contract, therefore I am counting those games as tougher games, due to the fact that UD could not schedule another tougher home and home series opponent, since that would force UD to then play a 15/15 schedule, which we all know is NEVER going to happen.
Those Miami at UD games were not buy games for UD.
|
08-01-2017, 12:14 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,784
Thanks: 140
Thanked 1,145 Times in 598 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by ud2
I will give you 2015-2016, where we played a similar schedule.
But no...not similar...weaker this year...last year we had 5 a/n games along with Vanderbilt and SMC at home.
2014-2015...same thing 5 a/n along with GT and Ole Miss at home.
2013-2014...again 5 a/n...USC and Murray State(2 for 1 contract)at home
2012-2013...5 a/n...Miami and Illinois State at home as part of home and home contracts
And then the A10 years where we did sometimes play 6 a/n along with 3 tougher home games that were part of home and home contracts, due to the 16 game league schedule, instead of 18 league games.
|
And in 2015-16, we had Top 25 Non-Conf SOS.
|
Mad Props to bcross For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
08-01-2017, 12:19 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,784
Thanks: 140
Thanked 1,145 Times in 598 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by ud2
No, I totally disagree.
The Miami at UD games were part of home and home contracts. UD was locked into those games at UD due to the home and home contract, therefore I am counting those games as tougher games, due to the fact that UD could not schedule another tougher home and home series opponent, since that would force UD to then play a 15/15 schedule, which we all know is NEVER going to happen.
Those Miami at UD games were not buy games for UD.
|
Which is nonsense. If we were returning the games to Akron/Ball State, would those games than be tougher this year in your eyes? It really has no effect on the current schedule.
Originally Posted by ud2
I am railing against the schedule. Why are we going backwards with scheduling this year? We could not find one more good home and home series this year? What changed vs. last year?
Last year, we had Vandy and SMC at home, this year just Auburn at home. Why?
What good does it do to weaken the schedule? We now may have to win more games to make the NCAAT. It is somewhat of a zero-sum game: if you weaken the schedule, then you have to win more games to make the NCAAT.
|
Last year, we just had Alabama on the road. This year we have Miss St. and SMC. Same amount of H/H's, just locations switch from year to year.
The one time deal vs. Northwestern in Chicago was a different situation with two seniors from Chicago.
Last edited by bcross; 08-01-2017 at 01:05 PM..
|
08-01-2017, 12:27 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,130
Thanks: 1,961
Thanked 2,464 Times in 1,288 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by bcross
Which is nonsense. If we were returning the games to Akron/Ball State, would those games than be tougher this year in your eyes? It really has no effect on the current schedule.
|
Agree, hard to follow ud2's logic on this one, Miami is a tough game because we can't schedule a tougher game? Makes no sense. But then again you have to consider the source.
|
Mad Props to UD62 For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
08-01-2017, 12:42 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,616
Thanks: 3,383
Thanked 3,108 Times in 1,418 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by ud2
No, I totally disagree.
The Miami at UD games were part of home and home contracts. UD was locked into those games at UD due to the home and home contract, therefore I am counting those games as tougher games, due to the fact that UD could not schedule another tougher home and home series opponent, since that would force UD to then play a 15/15 schedule, which we all know is NEVER going to happen.
Those Miami at UD games were not buy games for UD.
|
Please, just because they were home and home does not mean they are tougher. That is a joke of a way at looking at it. Miami OH was only a H&H because they were a long time rival even though the games have been one sided for a long time.
|
08-02-2017, 12:51 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 13,611
Thanks: 1,854
Thanked 17,159 Times in 5,119 Posts
|
|
In order to schedule a game, the other team has to want to play it too.
Small detail.
__________________
Hot shooting hides a multitude of sins.
"Yeah....220, 221, whatever it takes." - Jack Butler (Mr. Mom)
|
6 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to Chris R For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
10-03-2017, 12:49 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,351
Thanks: 325
Thanked 622 Times in 327 Posts
|
|
This might not be the best thread in which to post this, but this seemed to be an evolving scheduling discussion so maybe it's appropriate (from The Columbus Dispatch):
Chris Holtmann has promised to beef up his non-conference schedule and appeared amenable to adding in-state opponents at Ohio State. Today, both of those stated goals came to fruition with the news that the Buckeyes have scheduled a home-and-home series with Cincinnati to open the next two seasons.
To open the 2018-19 season, the Bearcats will host the Buckeyes at a newly renovated Fifth Third Arena. The next year, Ohio State will return the favor.
|
|
10-03-2017, 01:19 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,593
Thanks: 3,396
Thanked 6,634 Times in 3,033 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by MikeF
This might not be the best thread in which to post this, but this seemed to be an evolving scheduling discussion so maybe it's appropriate (from The Columbus Dispatch):
|
That's a pretty big deal. OSU hasn't been too keen on playing UC ever since UC beat them in back-to-back NCAA Championship games in 60-61 and 61-62.
|
10-03-2017, 06:50 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,562
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,172 Times in 4,202 Posts
|
|
In terms of historical rarities, this is a very big deal. OSU has not played UC in Cincinnati since 1920. UC has not played OSU in Columbus since 1921. They have only played each other 10 times.
I hope that some sort of 4 team series can be set up...OSU, UC, UD, and XU.
http://www.cincinnati.com/story/spor...018/727151001/:
// SERIES HISTORY: OHIO STATE LEADS 6-4
Ohio State leads the all-time series with the Bearcats 6-4. The teams have not met during regular-season play since 1921, which was the home opener for the Buckeyes and the only previous time the teams opened the season against one another. The Bearcats won that game 33-17. Ohio State played host to Cincinnati in five of the first six meetings, going 3-2 in those games. Ohio State has not played the Bearcats in Cincinnati since Jan. 3, 1920, a 35-13 win for the Buckeyes.
Three of the last four meetings have come during NCAA Tournament competition with all of the last four matchups contested on neutral courts. Ohio State was ranked No. 1 while the Bearcats were No. 2 in both the 1961 and 1962 NCAA National Championship games with Cincinnati winning the national title both times.
No. 4 Ohio State downed the Bearcats 72-50 in the Wooden Tradition in Indianapolis Dec. 16, 2006. The most recent meeting was in the 2012 NCAA East Regional Semifinals in Boston, an 81-66 win for the No. 7-ranked Buckeyes.
Date - Result
Feb. 4, 1905 – Ohio State won 42-6 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 15, 1907 – Cincinnati won 32-30 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 16, 1909 – Ohio State won 57-24 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 20, 1912 – Ohio State won 61-15 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 3, 1920 – Ohio State won 35-13 in Cincinnati
Dec. 10, 1921 – Cincinnati won 33-17 in Columbus, Ohio
March 25, 1961 – Cincinnati won 70-65 in overtime in the NCAA Tournament championship game in Kansas City, Missouri
March 24, 1962 – Cincinnati won 71-59 in the NCAA Tournament championship game in Louisville, Kentucky
Dec. 16, 2006 – Ohio State won 72-50 at the Wooden Tradition in Indianapolis
March 22, 2012 – Ohio State won 81-66 in the NCAA East Regional Semifinals in Boston
Last edited by ud2; 10-03-2017 at 06:53 PM..
|
10-03-2017, 11:00 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: PHL
Posts: 5,748
Thanks: 2,609
Thanked 2,341 Times in 1,412 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by ud2
In terms of historical rarities, this is a very big deal. OSU has not played UC in Cincinnati since 1920. UC has not played OSU in Columbus since 1921. They have only played each other 10 times.
I hope that some sort of 4 team series can be set up...OSU, UC, UD, and XU.
http://www.cincinnati.com/story/spor...018/727151001/:
// SERIES HISTORY: OHIO STATE LEADS 6-4
Ohio State leads the all-time series with the Bearcats 6-4. The teams have not met during regular-season play since 1921, which was the home opener for the Buckeyes and the only previous time the teams opened the season against one another. The Bearcats won that game 33-17. Ohio State played host to Cincinnati in five of the first six meetings, going 3-2 in those games. Ohio State has not played the Bearcats in Cincinnati since Jan. 3, 1920, a 35-13 win for the Buckeyes.
Three of the last four meetings have come during NCAA Tournament competition with all of the last four matchups contested on neutral courts. Ohio State was ranked No. 1 while the Bearcats were No. 2 in both the 1961 and 1962 NCAA National Championship games with Cincinnati winning the national title both times.
No. 4 Ohio State downed the Bearcats 72-50 in the Wooden Tradition in Indianapolis Dec. 16, 2006. The most recent meeting was in the 2012 NCAA East Regional Semifinals in Boston, an 81-66 win for the No. 7-ranked Buckeyes.
Date - Result
Feb. 4, 1905 – Ohio State won 42-6 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 15, 1907 – Cincinnati won 32-30 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 16, 1909 – Ohio State won 57-24 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 20, 1912 – Ohio State won 61-15 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 3, 1920 – Ohio State won 35-13 in Cincinnati
Dec. 10, 1921 – Cincinnati won 33-17 in Columbus, Ohio
March 25, 1961 – Cincinnati won 70-65 in overtime in the NCAA Tournament championship game in Kansas City, Missouri
March 24, 1962 – Cincinnati won 71-59 in the NCAA Tournament championship game in Louisville, Kentucky
Dec. 16, 2006 – Ohio State won 72-50 at the Wooden Tradition in Indianapolis
March 22, 2012 – Ohio State won 81-66 in the NCAA East Regional Semifinals in Boston
|
Uh, well, I guess that covers that.
|
10-04-2017, 09:00 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,616
Thanks: 3,383
Thanked 3,108 Times in 1,418 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by ud2
In terms of historical rarities, this is a very big deal. OSU has not played UC in Cincinnati since 1920. UC has not played OSU in Columbus since 1921. They have only played each other 10 times.
I hope that some sort of 4 team series can be set up...OSU, UC, UD, and XU.
http://www.cincinnati.com/story/spor...018/727151001/:
// SERIES HISTORY: OHIO STATE LEADS 6-4
Ohio State leads the all-time series with the Bearcats 6-4. The teams have not met during regular-season play since 1921, which was the home opener for the Buckeyes and the only previous time the teams opened the season against one another. The Bearcats won that game 33-17. Ohio State played host to Cincinnati in five of the first six meetings, going 3-2 in those games. Ohio State has not played the Bearcats in Cincinnati since Jan. 3, 1920, a 35-13 win for the Buckeyes.
Three of the last four meetings have come during NCAA Tournament competition with all of the last four matchups contested on neutral courts. Ohio State was ranked No. 1 while the Bearcats were No. 2 in both the 1961 and 1962 NCAA National Championship games with Cincinnati winning the national title both times.
No. 4 Ohio State downed the Bearcats 72-50 in the Wooden Tradition in Indianapolis Dec. 16, 2006. The most recent meeting was in the 2012 NCAA East Regional Semifinals in Boston, an 81-66 win for the No. 7-ranked Buckeyes.
Date - Result
Feb. 4, 1905 – Ohio State won 42-6 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 15, 1907 – Cincinnati won 32-30 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 16, 1909 – Ohio State won 57-24 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 20, 1912 – Ohio State won 61-15 in Columbus, Ohio
Jan. 3, 1920 – Ohio State won 35-13 in Cincinnati
Dec. 10, 1921 – Cincinnati won 33-17 in Columbus, Ohio
March 25, 1961 – Cincinnati won 70-65 in overtime in the NCAA Tournament championship game in Kansas City, Missouri
March 24, 1962 – Cincinnati won 71-59 in the NCAA Tournament championship game in Louisville, Kentucky
Dec. 16, 2006 – Ohio State won 72-50 at the Wooden Tradition in Indianapolis
March 22, 2012 – Ohio State won 81-66 in the NCAA East Regional Semifinals in Boston
|
Thanks for the history lesson, but what does this have to do with UD? OSU and UC didn't schedule us.
|
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to m21eagle45 For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
10-13-2017, 12:12 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,270
Thanks: 2,337
Thanked 3,923 Times in 2,155 Posts
|
|
|
Mad Props to OSU Flyer For This Totally Excellent Post:
|
|
10-23-2017, 10:09 PM
|
|
General of the Air Force
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Suburbs of Detroit
Posts: 9,758
Thanks: 218
Thanked 10,115 Times in 2,611 Posts
|
|
Just a heads up... Hofstra who we play in Charleston lost in there only exhibition game tonight at Fairfield... 94-78
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|