UDPride Discussion Forums    
     

Go Back   UDPride Discussion Forums > UDPRIDE SPORTS FORUMS > Mens Basketball

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-05-2015, 11:44 AM
rollo's Avatar
rollo rollo is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RolloCon
Posts: 16,574
Thanks: 16,264
Thanked 15,912 Times in 6,995 Posts
rollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond repute
First 2015-16 Bracketology - UD's a 10-seed

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology

No way we're a 10...
__________________
I shaved my balls for this?
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to rollo For This Totally Excellent Post:
CE80 (08-05-2015), Fan4allUDSports (08-05-2015)
Advertisement
  #2  
Old 08-05-2015, 12:13 PM
Fudd Fudd is offline
Commander in Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,350
Thanks: 4,403
Thanked 10,607 Times in 5,094 Posts
Fudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by rollo View Post
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology

No way we're a 10...
Just Pollard playing solo, 1 vs 5, is an eight seed.
Reply With Quote
5 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to Fudd For This Totally Excellent Post:
BRob2Perryman3 (08-05-2015), Flyer 86 (08-06-2015), FlyerGuyer (08-05-2015), FlyerYouBetcha (08-05-2015), rollo (08-05-2015)
  #3  
Old 08-05-2015, 12:36 PM
San Diego Flyer's Avatar
San Diego Flyer San Diego Flyer is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 14,790
Thanks: 10,098
Thanked 10,503 Times in 4,705 Posts
San Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond repute
A10 with two teams in? wtf!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-05-2015, 01:00 PM
CE80 CE80 is offline
General of the Air Force
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,778
Thanks: 5,498
Thanked 6,255 Times in 3,097 Posts
CE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond repute
Is there a place to bet over/under on the seed? I sure as heck will take the under on a 10 seed.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-05-2015, 01:02 PM
ruechalgrin's Avatar
ruechalgrin ruechalgrin is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: California
Posts: 3,103
Thanks: 4,298
Thanked 2,862 Times in 1,139 Posts
ruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond repute
Jeff Goodman listed Vandy as well as Dayton as 2 of 3 teams that are better than you think. He wrote about Dayton "I'll hitch my wagon to Archie Miller any day. The Flyers lost Jordan Sibert, but have depth and size now with 7-footer Steve McElvene."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-05-2015, 01:31 PM
ruechalgrin's Avatar
ruechalgrin ruechalgrin is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: California
Posts: 3,103
Thanks: 4,298
Thanked 2,862 Times in 1,139 Posts
ruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by San Diego Flyer View Post
A10 with two teams in? wtf!
Unfortunately, based upon our schedule both OOC and A-10, it is probably an accurate seed as we have no margin for error. I would actually put us in at an 11. This does not reflect how good the team will be, but reflects our lack of opportunities for top 50 wins.

The only teams we will play that are in the 2015-2016 bracket according to Joe Lunardi are: (1) Rhode Island an 11 seed who is in the first four; (2) Arkansas an 11 seed who is in the first four; and (3) Vandy a 9 seed. I think we split with Rhode Island, beat Arkansas, and lose @Vandy so we go 2-2 versus the field which is pretty similar to our 2-3 in 2014-2015.*

The good news is Iowa is next four out and if we beat them in 2015-2016, we likely play Notre Dame who is a #5 seed, and then either Xavier #9 seed or Wichita St. #3. Let's assume Iowa makes the field, we beat them, and split the final 2 games versus tourney teams. All of the sudden we are 4-3 versus the field which gets us a better seed than a 10, probably an 8 or 9.

I know I keep harping on this, but we absolutely need to beat Iowa, it is almost a must win. If we lose to Iowa (and let's assume they make the NCAA), we have almost no margin for error and are looking at 2-3 versus the field which is what we were in 2015 and we are probably sweating whether we get in.

Our inability to schedule a tough OOC (not blaming the Athletic Department) and the weakness of the A-10 make it extremely difficult to get higher than a 9 seed. So we will perpetually be on the bubble. Since 1984, we have been in the NCAA 9x and had only 2003 we had better than a 9 seed where we were a 4, the rest of the times we were a 9 (1x), 10 (2x), 11 (4x), or 12 (1x) seed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayton...27s_basketball

*For 2014-2015, (1) we lost to a 5 Arkansas; (2) lost to a 10 seed Davidson; (3) beat a first four 11 seed Ole Miss; and (4) beat/lost to a 7 seed VCU. So we were 2-3 versus the field of 68.
Reply With Quote
4 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to ruechalgrin For This Totally Excellent Post:
Flyer 86 (08-06-2015), FLYER5 (08-07-2015), FlyerGuyer (08-05-2015), ud2 (08-05-2015)
  #7  
Old 08-05-2015, 02:43 PM
DGO67 DGO67 is offline
Brigadier General
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,338
Thanks: 346
Thanked 736 Times in 475 Posts
DGO67 has a reputation beyond reputeDGO67 has a reputation beyond reputeDGO67 has a reputation beyond reputeDGO67 has a reputation beyond reputeDGO67 has a reputation beyond reputeDGO67 has a reputation beyond reputeDGO67 has a reputation beyond reputeDGO67 has a reputation beyond reputeDGO67 has a reputation beyond reputeDGO67 has a reputation beyond reputeDGO67 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ruechalgrin View Post
Unfortunately, based upon our schedule both OOC and A-10, it is probably an accurate seed as we have no margin for error. I would actually put us in at an 11. This does not reflect how good the team will be, but reflects our lack of opportunities for top 50 wins.

The only teams we will play that are in the 2015-2016 bracket according to Joe Lunardi are: (1) Rhode Island an 11 seed who is in the first four; (2) Arkansas an 11 seed who is in the first four; and (3) Vandy a 9 seed. I think we split with Rhode Island, beat Arkansas, and lose @Vandy so we go 2-2 versus the field which is pretty similar to our 2-3 in 2014-2015.*

The good news is Iowa is next four out and if we beat them in 2015-2016, we likely play Notre Dame who is a #5 seed, and then either Xavier #9 seed or Wichita St. #3. Let's assume Iowa makes the field, we beat them, and split the final 2 games versus tourney teams. All of the sudden we are 4-3 versus the field which gets us a better seed than a 10, probably an 8 or 9.

I know I keep harping on this, but we absolutely need to beat Iowa, it is almost a must win. If we lose to Iowa (and let's assume they make the NCAA), we have almost no margin for error and are looking at 2-3 versus the field which is what we were in 2015 and we are probably sweating whether we get in.

Our inability to schedule a tough OOC (not blaming the Athletic Department) and the weakness of the A-10 make it extremely difficult to get higher than a 9 seed. So we will perpetually be on the bubble. Since 1984, we have been in the NCAA 9x and had only 2003 we had better than a 9 seed where we were a 4, the rest of the times we were a 9 (1x), 10 (2x), 11 (4x), or 12 (1x) seed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayton...27s_basketball

*For 2014-2015, (1) we lost to a 5 Arkansas; (2) lost to a 10 seed Davidson; (3) beat a first four 11 seed Ole Miss; and (4) beat/lost to a 7 seed VCU. So we were 2-3 versus the field of 68.
Getting an 8 or 9 seed would be worrisome!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-05-2015, 02:51 PM
Chris R's Avatar
Chris R Chris R is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 13,606
Thanks: 1,853
Thanked 17,145 Times in 5,115 Posts
Chris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond repute
10, 12, 11, 4, 10, 11, 11, 11.

I think those are the seeds going back to 1984. There's a lesson there.
__________________

Hot shooting hides a multitude of sins.
Make everyone else's "one day" your "day one".
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to Chris R For This Totally Excellent Post:
FLYER5 (08-07-2015), flyerfever (08-07-2015)
  #9  
Old 08-05-2015, 02:53 PM
ruechalgrin's Avatar
ruechalgrin ruechalgrin is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: California
Posts: 3,103
Thanks: 4,298
Thanked 2,862 Times in 1,139 Posts
ruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Chris R View Post
10, 12, 11, 4, 10, 11, 11, 11.

I think those are the seeds going back to 1984. There's a lesson there.
Chris, agree with your point. Jus a nit, I think you missed the #9 seed in 1985.

NCAA Tournament seeding history
The NCAA began seeding the tournament with the 1979 edition.

Years → '84 '85 '90 '00 '03 '04 '09 '14 '15
Seeds 10 9 12 11 4 10 11 11 11

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayton...27s_basketball
Reply With Quote
4 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to ruechalgrin For This Totally Excellent Post:
Chris R (08-05-2015), Flyer 86 (08-06-2015), FLYER5 (08-07-2015), flyerfever (08-07-2015)
  #10  
Old 08-05-2015, 02:54 PM
m21eagle45's Avatar
m21eagle45 m21eagle45 is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,616
Thanks: 3,383
Thanked 3,108 Times in 1,418 Posts
m21eagle45 has a reputation beyond reputem21eagle45 has a reputation beyond reputem21eagle45 has a reputation beyond reputem21eagle45 has a reputation beyond reputem21eagle45 has a reputation beyond reputem21eagle45 has a reputation beyond reputem21eagle45 has a reputation beyond reputem21eagle45 has a reputation beyond reputem21eagle45 has a reputation beyond reputem21eagle45 has a reputation beyond reputem21eagle45 has a reputation beyond repute
If we are not a 4, 5, or 6 (Which I doubt we will be unless we win the Orlando Classic and the A-10) I would rather be an 11, 12, or 13 seed. I want to avoid the top 2 seeds as long as possible in the tourney.
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to m21eagle45 For This Totally Excellent Post:
ruechalgrin (08-05-2015)
  #11  
Old 08-05-2015, 03:20 PM
NCkevi's Avatar
NCkevi NCkevi is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,271
Thanks: 327
Thanked 3,076 Times in 1,229 Posts
NCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond repute
I know the bracket will look nothing like this by March, but if he thinks UD will be a 10 seed he should have put us in the Midwest vs. NC State because as much as they deny it, you know the NCAA likes a good storyline in the match-ups
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to NCkevi For This Totally Excellent Post:
Flyer 86 (08-06-2015), FLYER5 (08-07-2015)
  #12  
Old 08-05-2015, 04:22 PM
Fudd Fudd is offline
Commander in Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,350
Thanks: 4,403
Thanked 10,607 Times in 5,094 Posts
Fudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Chris R View Post
10, 12, 11, 4, 10, 11, 11, 11.

I think those are the seeds going back to 1984. There's a lesson there.
But last years selection committee was on crack. Nobody had us getting into the field as the last team except the committee and some select X fans posting from their mothers basements.
Reply With Quote
4 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to Fudd For This Totally Excellent Post:
bobber (08-06-2015), FLYER5 (08-07-2015), longtimefan (08-05-2015), redbengal (08-05-2015)
  #13  
Old 08-05-2015, 04:23 PM
ud2's Avatar
ud2 ud2 is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,551
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,167 Times in 4,198 Posts
ud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ruechalgrin View Post
Our inability to schedule a tough OOC (not blaming the Athletic Department)...
I, myself, am VERY CLEARLY blaming the Athletic Department.


I can believe a 10 seed or worse, they are going to have to really kick butt in the A10 if they lose to Iowa.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-05-2015, 04:27 PM
San Diego Flyer's Avatar
San Diego Flyer San Diego Flyer is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 14,790
Thanks: 10,098
Thanked 10,503 Times in 4,705 Posts
San Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Chris R View Post
10, 12, 11, 4, 10, 11, 11, 11.

I think those are the seeds going back to 1984. There's a lesson there.
I hope no one recalls our performance as a 4 seed in Spokane.
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to San Diego Flyer For This Totally Excellent Post:
FLYER5 (08-07-2015), SacramentoFlyer (08-10-2015)
  #15  
Old 08-05-2015, 04:36 PM
ruechalgrin's Avatar
ruechalgrin ruechalgrin is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: California
Posts: 3,103
Thanks: 4,298
Thanked 2,862 Times in 1,139 Posts
ruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Fudd View Post
But last years selection committee was on crack. Nobody had us getting into the field as the last team except the committee and some select X fans posting from their mothers basements.
The committee was consistent in using the same criteria and UD should have been last two in or last two out. They were consistent and fair.
http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/dance.htm

I disagree with the criteria the committee uses, but it is what it is.

With all due respect Fudd, I think it is conventional wisdom that the committee wronged us and was on crack. We were 2-3 versus RPI top 50 on Selection Sunday (wins @VCU and Ole Miss, losses @Davidson, @Arkansas, andNeutral VCU). I think we had the least amount of top 50 wins of any at-large team on Selection Sunday. Again, I disagree with the committee's criteria and focus on top 50 games, but it is what it is.
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to ruechalgrin For This Totally Excellent Post:
FLYER5 (08-07-2015), ud2 (08-05-2015)
  #16  
Old 08-05-2015, 04:37 PM
Fudd Fudd is offline
Commander in Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,350
Thanks: 4,403
Thanked 10,607 Times in 5,094 Posts
Fudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond repute
It's been a while since we only had two A10 teams in the NCAA tournament hasn't it? Even in the very down year that we had last year, we had 3 teams in. Does anyone think the A10 will be weaker than last year in this upcoming year?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-05-2015, 04:39 PM
Fudd Fudd is offline
Commander in Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,350
Thanks: 4,403
Thanked 10,607 Times in 5,094 Posts
Fudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ruechalgrin View Post
The committee was consistent in using the same criteria and UD should have been last two in or last two out. They were consistent and fair.
http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/dance.htm

I disagree with the criteria the committee uses, but it is what it is.

With all due respect Fudd, I think it is conventional wisdom that the committee wronged us and was on crack. We were 2-3 versus RPI top 50 on Selection Sunday (wins @VCU and Ole Miss, losses @Davidson, @Arkansas, andNeutral VCU). I think we had the least amount of top 50 wins of any at-large team on Selection Sunday. Again, I disagree with the committee's criteria and focus on top 50 games, but it is what it is.
Why was their decision on UD's place in the tournament such a departure from every other prognosticator out there in the media? They choose to emphasize a different metric each year.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-05-2015, 04:42 PM
ud2's Avatar
ud2 ud2 is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,551
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,167 Times in 4,198 Posts
ud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ruechalgrin View Post
The committee was consistent in using the same criteria and UD should have been last two in or last two out. They were consistent and fair.

With all due respect Fudd, I think it is conventional wisdom that the committee wronged us and was on crack.
Agree, UD did not get jobbed last year, rpi 33 and SOS 93 is major bubble territory.

The Dance Card had it right, everybody else was wrong.

Last edited by ud2; 08-05-2015 at 04:56 PM..
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to ud2 For This Totally Excellent Post:
FLYER5 (08-07-2015)
  #19  
Old 08-05-2015, 05:01 PM
ruechalgrin's Avatar
ruechalgrin ruechalgrin is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: California
Posts: 3,103
Thanks: 4,298
Thanked 2,862 Times in 1,139 Posts
ruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Fudd View Post
Why was their decision on UD's place in the tournament such a departure from every other prognosticator out there in the media? They choose to emphasize a different metric each year.
Fudd, dance card methodology has used the same criteria for 14 years -- it is what they believe the committee has used and is unbiased in that it is an algorithm with no human bias. The prognosticators and media have human bias and change their views based upon conventional wisdom.

http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/dance.htm

The committee has been consistent. Using dance card which measures consistency, they are 143/146 the last 4 years for at-large teams (I don't have boise state and dayton in and colorado state and miami out as misses). If the committee would have simply used the algorithm, they would have come to 98% of the same conclusions and only made 3 different choices in 4 years. That is amazingly consistent. The Committee IS NOT using different metrics.

We at UD simply don't like the criteria they use. And I think the criteria is awful and massively benefits teams like Texas who can go 3-12 in top 50 games with half of them at home, but get in because they won 3 top 50 games. Give Dayton 15 top 50 games with half at home and UD would win at least 7. But the criteria is what it is.

Last edited by ruechalgrin; 08-05-2015 at 05:25 PM..
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to ruechalgrin For This Totally Excellent Post:
FLYER5 (08-07-2015), flyerfever (08-07-2015)
  #20  
Old 08-05-2015, 05:08 PM
UD62 UD62 is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,129
Thanks: 1,957
Thanked 2,463 Times in 1,288 Posts
UD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ud2 View Post
I, myself, am VERY CLEARLY blaming the Athletic Department.


I can believe a 10 seed or worse, they are going to have to really kick butt in the A10 if they lose to Iowa.
Give it a rest, nothing but criticism from you. As I recall we have done fairly well the last few years with the athletic department we have. You take a bracket projection that isn't worth spit and take it as gospel because it fits your opinion of the program and their ability to schedule. I know, play another away game (with Miami no less) and our "troubles " will be over.
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to UD62 For This Totally Excellent Post:
Glen Clark (08-09-2015), longtimefan (08-05-2015)
  #21  
Old 08-05-2015, 05:28 PM
NCkevi's Avatar
NCkevi NCkevi is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,271
Thanks: 327
Thanked 3,076 Times in 1,229 Posts
NCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ruechalgrin
The committee has been consistent. Using dance card which measures consistency, they are 143/146 the last 4 years for at-large teams (I don't have boise state and dayton in and colorado state and miami out as misses). If the committee would have simply used the algorithm, they would have come to 98% of the same conclusions and only made 3 different choices in 4 years. That is amazingly consistent. The Committee IS NOT using different metrics.

We at UD simply don't like the criteria they use.
If they use the Dance Card algorithum consistantly than I can see them being off a seed line or two; but there should be no wide variations such as a UCLA having a .07% chance of a bid not only making the tournament, but avoiding the 1st round and a Temple being 100% in not making it. They obviously deviated from the algorithum for some reason in those cases so they are using their own metrics on a case by case basis when they see fit
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to NCkevi For This Totally Excellent Post:
flyerfever (08-07-2015), longtimefan (08-05-2015)
  #22  
Old 08-05-2015, 05:34 PM
ud2's Avatar
ud2 ud2 is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,551
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,167 Times in 4,198 Posts
ud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by UD62 View Post
Give it a rest, nothing but criticism from you. As I recall we have done fairly well the last few years with the athletic department we have. You take a bracket projection that isn't worth spit and take it as gospel because it fits your opinion of the program and their ability to schedule. I know, play another away game (with Miami no less) and our "troubles " will be over.
Agree, I'll back off, but I just can't believe they scheduled ONE true road game after the SOS was such a major issue last year. SMH

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-05-2015, 05:50 PM
bcross bcross is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,784
Thanks: 140
Thanked 1,145 Times in 598 Posts
bcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond repute
Only 1 Top-50 RPI win, and a 200+ RPI loss had as much to do with us being barely in as anything.
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to bcross For This Totally Excellent Post:
flyerfever (08-07-2015)
  #24  
Old 08-05-2015, 07:42 PM
CE80 CE80 is offline
General of the Air Force
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,778
Thanks: 5,498
Thanked 6,255 Times in 3,097 Posts
CE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond reputeCE80 has a reputation beyond repute
I forget. Did we get in the NCAA tourney last year? Did we win any games?
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to CE80 For This Totally Excellent Post:
Bat'71 (08-06-2015), SacramentoFlyer (08-10-2015)
  #25  
Old 08-05-2015, 08:23 PM
UDTradition UDTradition is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 625
Thanks: 759
Thanked 407 Times in 203 Posts
UDTradition has a brilliant futureUDTradition has a brilliant futureUDTradition has a brilliant futureUDTradition has a brilliant futureUDTradition has a brilliant futureUDTradition has a brilliant futureUDTradition has a brilliant futureUDTradition has a brilliant futureUDTradition has a brilliant futureUDTradition has a brilliant futureUDTradition has a brilliant future
Their process is simple. Run the numbers then see the results. If the results don't make sense to them (based upon their 100+ years of experience) then they use their gut to determine the final few invitees. Basically, they decide if they can live with the analytical results. If they can't then they change to order of things. Sounds like a solid approach...we're ticked off because we were part of the intuition phase.

I think we were fortunate to make the tournament based upon their criteria (albeit subjective). Our strength of schedule was anemic and it is clear that our administration favors a gaudy record over away losses. In the future we need to adopt the Temple philosophy...if you reply please use their past body of evidence...not last year.

I'd rather lose to the best then beat 250 RPI. If we make the tournament by beating some of the best then I'm very happy. If we don't make the tournament...then that is fine too. It makes for a great season if you play against top teams.

Playing and beating 200+teams is a coward's approach and clearly results in a first round game or worse.

Just my opinion.......
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-05-2015, 09:27 PM
Chris R's Avatar
Chris R Chris R is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 13,606
Thanks: 1,853
Thanked 17,145 Times in 5,115 Posts
Chris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond reputeChris R has a reputation beyond repute
^^ and that's a perfectly fine position to take. However, are you prepared to let the UD womens basketball program, volleyball program, soccer programs, and other championship/NCAA tourney level programs become perennial middle-of-the-pack A10 programs in order for mens basketball to shave 2-3 games off their home schedule every year and all the proceeds that go with it, in order to play more road games against those teams you cite. Good, bad, or indifferent, mens basketball makes the UD athletic department tick. And by tick I mean the most competitive and most successful in the entire Atlantic10. Are you willing to part with that. Maybe you are which is fine.

And keep in mind, those teams you'd like UD to play must want to play UD as much or more than UD wants to play them. I have never seen any evidence to suggest that is the case. Temple has a recent basketball history (last 20yrs) that quite honestly shames much of what Dayton has done. They may be more marketable from a "profile game" standpoint. And, Temple has never had strong home attendance, thereby foregoing home games in exchange for road games costs a program like Temple far less than a school like Dayton. When you eliminate 35,000 ticket sales for 3 home games rather than 10,000 or 15,000 ticket sales to home games, that's a big difference. Im not sure its apples and oranges.

Temple also plays FBS football. Even the awful teams are finding it worth their time and money to keep playing it. If it was such a financial hole, the entire MAC would have disbanded football 20yrs ago. Some night there are 750 people in the stands for a Tuesday night BGSU vs. Kent State game. The fact that these teams continue to choose to field 85 scholarship athletes, run a football stadium, travel, train, house, and feed these beefcakes tells me all I need to know about whether they think being lousy and with no fan base for football is better than a life without football altogether.

Every action has an equal an opposite reaction when it comes to scheduling. Im not objecting to the different directions fans suggest. But its worth reminding fans that every choice comes with a price and are fans truly prepared to pay that price -- either in actual dollars, overall athletic department competitiveness, student-athlete welfare, university mission, etc. You simply cannot move a domino in this topic and not expect other dominoes on the table to be entirely unaffected.
__________________

Hot shooting hides a multitude of sins.
Make everyone else's "one day" your "day one".
Reply With Quote
4 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to Chris R For This Totally Excellent Post:
Bat'71 (08-06-2015), Flyer Al (08-05-2015), flyerfever (08-07-2015), Townie (08-06-2015)
  #27  
Old 08-05-2015, 11:45 PM
ud2's Avatar
ud2 ud2 is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,551
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,167 Times in 4,198 Posts
ud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond repute
Creighton, while in the MVC, was following UD's 16/14 model, VCU, Xavier, and Butler were doing at least 15 away/neutral in the CAA, A10, and Horizon League.

Just get into the BE, and this becomes a dead issue, UD can play 16/14 or 17/13 at that point, and it won't matter, the league will take care of the SOS.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-06-2015, 09:12 AM
springborofan springborofan is offline
Brigadier General
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Springboro
Posts: 2,421
Thanks: 2,215
Thanked 2,765 Times in 1,132 Posts
springborofan has a reputation beyond reputespringborofan has a reputation beyond reputespringborofan has a reputation beyond reputespringborofan has a reputation beyond reputespringborofan has a reputation beyond reputespringborofan has a reputation beyond reputespringborofan has a reputation beyond reputespringborofan has a reputation beyond reputespringborofan has a reputation beyond reputespringborofan has a reputation beyond reputespringborofan has a reputation beyond repute
Now Chris, you are taking the argument to the extreme to make your point. No one is suggesting that UD lop off 3 buy games and start the new and improved UD road show. 1 additional game on the road vs 1 buy game against a 200+RPI is what I believe UD2 is suggesting. I get your point that you need a willing participant but I'm not convinced that UD is even trying. They have a scheduling model and fit games to the model as best as possible.

Although I won't continue posting about it, I agree that UD should reconsider the current model. Creativity is in order. Drop 3 buy games against 200+ teams and play 3 2-1 series with teams like Murray St., Indiana St, Belmont, etc. Play a true road game against a UK or Duke that ESPN picks up. Yes, the athletic dept. loses some revenue but if it helps get UD in the tourney, the $ from that more than covers the delta.
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to springborofan For This Totally Excellent Post:
BRob2Perryman3 (08-06-2015), ud2 (08-06-2015)
  #29  
Old 08-06-2015, 10:41 AM
UDDoug UDDoug is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,242
Thanks: 66
Thanked 3,342 Times in 1,988 Posts
UDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond repute
Playing more road games isn't necessarily the answer. Playing a 51-100 RPI team on the road most definitely is not the panacea. If you add two of those, and you lose both, you can say welcome to the NIT.

The road/neutral/away mix has far less to do with it than record against top 50, losses to sub 100. Playing one way games against top 50 to build SOS and losing them won't get a team outside the Power 5 an NCAA bid.

Dayton isn't on the bubble last year if they don't get drubbed at Duquesne or lose at LaSalle when wins get the regular season conference championship. Playing two more of those games actually makes it more likely they get left out.
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to UDDoug For This Totally Excellent Post:
longtimefan (08-06-2015)
  #30  
Old 08-06-2015, 11:14 AM
ud2's Avatar
ud2 ud2 is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,551
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,167 Times in 4,198 Posts
ud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by springborofan View Post
Now Chris, you are taking the argument to the extreme to make your point. No one is suggesting that UD lop off 3 buy games and start the new and improved UD road show. 1 additional game on the road vs 1 buy game against a 200+RPI is what I believe UD2 is suggesting. I get your point that you need a willing participant but I'm not convinced that UD is even trying. They have a scheduling model and fit games to the model as best as possible.

Although I won't continue posting about it, I agree that UD should reconsider the current model. Creativity is in order. Drop 3 buy games against 200+ teams and play 3 2-1 series with teams like Murray St., Indiana St, Belmont, etc. Play a true road game against a UK or Duke that ESPN picks up. Yes, the athletic dept. loses some revenue but if it helps get UD in the tourney, the $ from that more than covers the delta.
Yes, that is what I'm advocating, one more home and home series vs. a good but still beatable opponent and one less buy game...yes, I'm not convinced that UD is even trying...yes, more NCAA tournament appearances make up for the lost revenue. Agree with you on all fronts.

Originally Posted by UDDoug View Post
Playing more road games isn't necessarily the answer. Playing a 51-100 RPI team on the road most definitely is not the panacea. If you add two of those, and you lose both, you can say welcome to the NIT.

The road/neutral/away mix has far less to do with it than record against top 50, losses to sub 100. Playing one way games against top 50 to build SOS and losing them won't get a team outside the Power 5 an NCAA bid.

Dayton isn't on the bubble last year if they don't get drubbed at Duquesne or lose at LaSalle when wins get the regular season conference championship. Playing two more of those games actually makes it more likely they get left out.
What is wrong with a home and home series with #51-100? But, yes, you have to win your fair share of those games.

Duquesne was fatigue I believe...LaSalle was decent I believe...you will lose league games at times, those losses happen to everyone...unexpected league losses are why the OOC SOS has to get better.

The only way to get more rpi top 50/top 100 games is via more home and home series.

Last edited by ud2; 08-06-2015 at 11:48 AM..
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to ud2 For This Totally Excellent Post:
FLYER5 (08-07-2015), OSU Flyer (08-06-2015)
  #31  
Old 08-06-2015, 11:30 AM
jack72's Avatar
jack72 jack72 is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bluffton, SC
Posts: 22,250
Thanks: 17,636
Thanked 10,168 Times in 5,896 Posts
jack72 has a reputation beyond reputejack72 has a reputation beyond reputejack72 has a reputation beyond reputejack72 has a reputation beyond reputejack72 has a reputation beyond reputejack72 has a reputation beyond reputejack72 has a reputation beyond reputejack72 has a reputation beyond reputejack72 has a reputation beyond reputejack72 has a reputation beyond reputejack72 has a reputation beyond repute
Picking brackets this early is a joke. We can feel bad about a 10 seed, but how about Davidson fans, who are snubbed completely?
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to jack72 For This Totally Excellent Post:
FLYER5 (08-07-2015), Flyer69ers (08-06-2015)
  #32  
Old 08-06-2015, 12:21 PM
UDDoug UDDoug is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,242
Thanks: 66
Thanked 3,342 Times in 1,988 Posts
UDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond reputeUDDoug has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ud2 View Post
What is wrong with a home and home series with #51-100? But, yes, you have to win your fair share of those games.
There is nothing wrong with it. But if you are going to argue that not playing those series might keep you out of the NCAA because SOS is weaker, you have to acknowledge that playing it AND losing is just as, or even more likely, to keep you out.

There is no panacea because SOS might keep you out, losing against a stronger schedule might keep you out, not playing enough road games might keep you out, losing road games might keep you out. Remind me how the SOS helped get Temple a bid last year?

That's my point - you can play it either way. But the only way that leads to a bid outside the Power 5 is to win enough nonconference games, win enough conference games. If they want a reason to keep you out, they will find one. If your point is play a higher ranked schedule, play more road games, AND win just as many then I agree, you will be more certain of a bid. I'm just not so certain all of those ifs come together very often.
Reply With Quote
4 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to UDDoug For This Totally Excellent Post:
Gazoo (08-06-2015), longtimefan (08-06-2015), m21eagle45 (08-06-2015), The Fly (08-06-2015)
  #33  
Old 08-06-2015, 12:27 PM
ud2's Avatar
ud2 ud2 is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,551
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,167 Times in 4,198 Posts
ud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond repute
FWIW, Creighton, in the MVC, followed UD's model...gaudy record with a weaker schedule...their rpi was consistently in the 20's, and their SOS was consistently 80/90/100/110+...only 5 or so losses every year...so that approach does work, but you have to keep the losses to a minimum or else you won't get a bid.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 08-06-2015, 12:51 PM
OSU Flyer's Avatar
OSU Flyer OSU Flyer is offline
General
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,270
Thanks: 2,337
Thanked 3,922 Times in 2,155 Posts
OSU Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeOSU Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeOSU Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeOSU Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeOSU Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeOSU Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeOSU Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeOSU Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeOSU Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeOSU Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeOSU Flyer has a reputation beyond repute
Give me 2 road games every year, an exempt tourney and dump Miami series I'd be happy

the SOS and the RPI are nice but I think a road win or marquee victory is really what holds weight. I'm almost a certain a road win over VCU got us in the tourney
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to OSU Flyer For This Totally Excellent Post:
CE80 (08-06-2015)
  #35  
Old 08-06-2015, 01:26 PM
NJFlyr71's Avatar
NJFlyr71 NJFlyr71 is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ Beach Livin'
Posts: 3,234
Thanks: 1,487
Thanked 1,914 Times in 1,084 Posts
NJFlyr71 has a reputation beyond reputeNJFlyr71 has a reputation beyond reputeNJFlyr71 has a reputation beyond reputeNJFlyr71 has a reputation beyond reputeNJFlyr71 has a reputation beyond reputeNJFlyr71 has a reputation beyond reputeNJFlyr71 has a reputation beyond reputeNJFlyr71 has a reputation beyond reputeNJFlyr71 has a reputation beyond reputeNJFlyr71 has a reputation beyond reputeNJFlyr71 has a reputation beyond repute
I say again. One road game here, or one 50-100 rpi home game there ...

you guys are talking as if a slight change or added spice to the recipe is what UD needs is all wrong. WRONG I tell you

The ONLY recipe you need to consider is the P5 recipe. If you got a P5 recipe your chances are greatly improved. If not then these slight tweaks being discussed are just that ... slight to no material affect. Makes you feel better great, but that is not what increases those chances.

1 more road game is not what is lacking for a institution like UD. One home and home with a better team such as an Ill. or Murray State is not the majic ingredient. Sorry about that.

Now If you just want to see a really good team (take your pick on anyone with a 50 or less rpi) on the schedule, now I say yea that would be great just from the stand point of the entertainment and excitement level alone, but do not mistake that for the ingredient missing from extending our chances for the NCAA ...

The main recipe for entry into the NCAA is 1) win most of your games, 2) don't lose to the +100 rpi ones, 3) be a leader in your conference (top 3 or 4), 4) be IN the conference tournament finals and then hope to God that the NCAA folks believe you are worth an invite. (PS if you win in item 4 you don't have to hope!)

If you have that P5 recipe please disregard items 1,3 and 4 above. Don't meet item 2? Lets see what rules we can bend!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-06-2015, 01:30 PM
UD62 UD62 is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,129
Thanks: 1,957
Thanked 2,463 Times in 1,288 Posts
UD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond reputeUD62 has a reputation beyond repute
Dayton isn't on the bubble last year if they don't get drubbed at Duquesne or lose at LaSalle when wins get the regular season conference championship. Playing two more of those games actually makes it more likely they get left out.[/QUOTE]

BINGO!!!
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to UD62 For This Totally Excellent Post:
FLYER5 (08-07-2015)
  #37  
Old 08-06-2015, 01:58 PM
Flyer 86's Avatar
Flyer 86 Flyer 86 is offline
General
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 7,175
Thanks: 31,846
Thanked 1,269 Times in 787 Posts
Flyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by DGO67 View Post
Getting an 8 or 9 seed would be worrisome!
getting another 11 seed would be Worrisome!!
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to Flyer 86 For This Totally Excellent Post:
FLYER5 (08-07-2015), jack72 (08-06-2015)
  #38  
Old 08-06-2015, 05:03 PM
Larymike's Avatar
Larymike Larymike is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Clemente, CA
Posts: 365
Thanks: 312
Thanked 91 Times in 62 Posts
Larymike is a name known to allLarymike is a name known to allLarymike is a name known to allLarymike is a name known to allLarymike is a name known to allLarymike is a name known to all
Based on only having 2 A-10 teams in this projection is assuming Dayton wins the tournament. Knowing that I see no way they are getting that bad of a seeding.
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to Larymike For This Totally Excellent Post:
redbengal (08-06-2015)
  #39  
Old 08-06-2015, 09:56 PM
bobber's Avatar
bobber bobber is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 4,089
Thanks: 4,532
Thanked 1,687 Times in 927 Posts
bobber has a reputation beyond reputebobber has a reputation beyond reputebobber has a reputation beyond reputebobber has a reputation beyond reputebobber has a reputation beyond reputebobber has a reputation beyond reputebobber has a reputation beyond reputebobber has a reputation beyond reputebobber has a reputation beyond reputebobber has a reputation beyond reputebobber has a reputation beyond repute
If the pundits have us as a 10 we had better say our prayers. We'll be appearing in the play-in again, or worse yet the three letter tournament.

You know the Selection Committee will stick it to us.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 08-07-2015, 12:52 AM
ud2's Avatar
ud2 ud2 is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,551
Thanks: 6,799
Thanked 6,167 Times in 4,198 Posts
ud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond reputeud2 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by UDDoug View Post
There is nothing wrong with it. But if you are going to argue that not playing those series might keep you out of the NCAA because SOS is weaker, you have to acknowledge that playing it AND losing is just as, or even more likely, to keep you out.

There is no panacea because SOS might keep you out, losing against a stronger schedule might keep you out, not playing enough road games might keep you out, losing road games might keep you out. Remind me how the SOS helped get Temple a bid last year?

That's my point - you can play it either way. But the only way that leads to a bid outside the Power 5 is to win enough nonconference games, win enough conference games. If they want a reason to keep you out, they will find one. If your point is play a higher ranked schedule, play more road games, AND win just as many then I agree, you will be more certain of a bid. I'm just not so certain all of those ifs come together very often.
Well, I think the program is ready to take the next step in terms of increasing the schedule difficulty, this is a new era with AM at the helm.

But, I can also see the fear: the program is at a delicate/sensitive point in getting close to being near annual NCAA tournament qualifiers, fans want more success before making any big changes, don't fix what isn't broken, etc.

So, I think the fans aren't yet ready for this change, and that's fine, maybe someday that change will come.

If UD at some point comes up just short of a bid due to the SOS being weak, then that change may come sooner than expected.

Last edited by ud2; 08-07-2015 at 01:05 AM..
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to ud2 For This Totally Excellent Post:
FLYER5 (08-07-2015)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement System V2.6 By   Branden

     
 
Copyright 1996-2012 UDPride.com. All Rights Reserved.