UDPride Discussion Forums    
     

Go Back   UDPride Discussion Forums > UDPRIDE SPORTS FORUMS > Mens Basketball

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-12-2009, 01:20 PM
ruechalgrin's Avatar
ruechalgrin ruechalgrin is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: California
Posts: 3,101
Thanks: 4,298
Thanked 2,862 Times in 1,139 Posts
ruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond reputeruechalgrin has a reputation beyond repute
#24 in RPI with 26th SOS

We all need to put the season in prespective. After 9 games, we are #24 in RPI with the 26th based SOS. http://www.realtimerpi.com/rpi_Men.html

We are 2-2 againist top 100 teams losing to 2 top 15 teams. If we had a few breaks and won either Villanova or Kst., all of us would be happy at 8-1 with a RPI of like 12. But we are not that far off at 7-2.

I agree we have not played that well yet for 40 minutes, but the stats above are pretty promising based upon UD having a lot more upside than downside in playing better than rest of the season.
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
  #2  
Old 12-12-2009, 01:32 PM
FlyingArrow FlyingArrow is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,214
Thanks: 1,228
Thanked 1,484 Times in 810 Posts
FlyingArrow has a reputation beyond reputeFlyingArrow has a reputation beyond reputeFlyingArrow has a reputation beyond reputeFlyingArrow has a reputation beyond reputeFlyingArrow has a reputation beyond reputeFlyingArrow has a reputation beyond reputeFlyingArrow has a reputation beyond reputeFlyingArrow has a reputation beyond reputeFlyingArrow has a reputation beyond reputeFlyingArrow has a reputation beyond reputeFlyingArrow has a reputation beyond repute
I'd rather be playing like we are and winning like we are than playing great and losing heartbreakers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2009, 03:08 PM
lilrudy4787's Avatar
lilrudy4787 lilrudy4787 is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Centerville
Posts: 1,546
Thanks: 145
Thanked 255 Times in 163 Posts
lilrudy4787 will become famous soon enough
Not to kill the buzz, but we are #71 in kenpom and #44 in sagarin, which the committee uses much more than RPI nowadays. RPI is old school and becoming outdated. Kenpom and Sagarin are new school much more advanced statisical models

#71 in kenpom doesnt surprise, but #44 in sagarin is pretty good for us
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2009, 03:08 PM
ud69's Avatar
ud69 ud69 is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,099
Thanks: 2,201
Thanked 5,170 Times in 2,285 Posts
ud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond repute
Actually it was 24 RPI with a 25 SOS, but it is changing all the time. realtimerpi has a lot of errors.

http://www.udpride.com/images/rpi.htm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-12-2009, 03:19 PM
Fudd Fudd is offline
Commander in Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,326
Thanks: 4,391
Thanked 10,569 Times in 5,077 Posts
Fudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond reputeFudd has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by lilrudy4787 View Post
Not to kill the buzz, but we are #71 in kenpom and #44 in sagarin, which the committee uses much more than RPI nowadays. RPI is old school and becoming outdated. Kenpom and Sagarin are new school much more advanced statisical models

#71 in kenpom doesnt surprise, but #44 in sagarin is pretty good for us
Where did you hear that Kenpom and Sagarin were used by the committee?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2009, 03:22 PM
ud69's Avatar
ud69 ud69 is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,099
Thanks: 2,201
Thanked 5,170 Times in 2,285 Posts
ud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond reputeud69 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Fudd View Post
Where did you hear that Kenpom and Sagarin were used by the committee?
They're not.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2009, 03:24 PM
NCkevi's Avatar
NCkevi NCkevi is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,269
Thanks: 327
Thanked 3,076 Times in 1,229 Posts
NCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond reputeNCkevi has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Fudd View Post
Where did you hear that Kenpom and Sagarin were used by the committee?
I was wondering this as well - I thought it was rpi and not kenpoim and sagarin
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-12-2009, 03:32 PM
lilrudy4787's Avatar
lilrudy4787 lilrudy4787 is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Centerville
Posts: 1,546
Thanks: 145
Thanked 255 Times in 163 Posts
lilrudy4787 will become famous soon enough
Originally Posted by NCkevi View Post
I was wondering this as well - I thought it was rpi and not kenpoim and sagarin
Who says that they use anything, We dont know how they make up their choices.

I assume the people in those committees use any and all knowledge at their disposal. Which includes this.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-12-2009, 03:38 PM
bcross bcross is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,784
Thanks: 140
Thanked 1,145 Times in 598 Posts
bcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond reputebcross has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by lilrudy4787 View Post
Who says that they use anything, We dont know how they make up their choices.

I assume the people in those committees use any and all knowledge at their disposal. Which includes this.
Read any article on the Mock selection process and you get pretty good indication on what is used. Sagarin and Pomeroy are not made available to committee members when they are making their final decisions. The big thing is the RPI of your opponents in determining goods wins/bad losses and not necessarily a team's individual RPI.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-12-2009, 03:55 PM
Rick Scaia Rick Scaia is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Mythological Land of Dayton, OH
Posts: 258
Thanks: 36
Thanked 298 Times in 104 Posts
Rick Scaia has much to be proud ofRick Scaia has much to be proud ofRick Scaia has much to be proud ofRick Scaia has much to be proud ofRick Scaia has much to be proud ofRick Scaia has much to be proud ofRick Scaia has much to be proud ofRick Scaia has much to be proud ofRick Scaia has much to be proud ofRick Scaia has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by lilrudy4787 View Post
Not to kill the buzz, but we are #71 in kenpom and #44 in sagarin, which the committee uses much more than RPI nowadays.
Ahem: http://www.midmajority.com/2009/02/m...-2009.php#more

So the committee uses WHAT, now? Want a do-over on that one?

No argument that there are other, more complex ratings schemes out there to look at, depending on what you're trying to rank (Sagarin is related to RPI and is just a more robust power rankings system, whereas KenPom doesn't care at all about describing past/existing wins and DOES care more about his system being predictive for future games which isn't even close to what you want in a selection heuristic), but not a one of those other rankings is even on the selection committee's radar. RPI is the one and only number in the room when they make their picks.

The committee's ability to emphasize or marginalize RPI to suit their needs (it clearly counts differently for different teams' resumes) may speak to a subjective application of the numbers, but it's still -- as a simple matter of fact and record as outlined in the above link for all to see/comprehend -- the only objective rankings data in use.

And hey, this is the first week when RPI becomes sorta-maybe-kinda-relevent and our objective rankings look GOOD. So hooray for RPI...


Rick
Reply With Quote
5 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to Rick Scaia For This Totally Excellent Post:
forego1 (12-12-2009), IAFlyer (12-12-2009), THirt (12-12-2009), UD Sam (12-13-2009), vfly (12-15-2009)
  #11  
Old 12-12-2009, 05:03 PM
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ's Avatar
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ ClearTheRunwayForWLJ is offline
Locked
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: On an island
Posts: 1,783
Thanks: 175
Thanked 576 Times in 305 Posts
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these partsClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these partsClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these parts
Haha, what a joke of a comment.

A Kenpom (even more than a Sargin) or whatever ranking is based on his theory of ranking a basketball team through luck and what not.

The committee does not factor in "luck," they could care less that UD beat Towson by 2 or whatever.

I never look at Kenpom, ever, his site is a joke. Sargin is slightly more realistic. Those guys are trying to make a buck being the "anti" selection committee.

Fact is OOC SOS is looked at the most out of anything the committee looks at. They want to know who you played and how you did, conference SOS cannot be planned. If I had to rank them most important in order (especially for a mid-major like us).

OOC SOS
Total Wins/Losses and top 50 rpi wins
RPI
Overall SOS
Road/Home Splits
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-12-2009, 05:51 PM
lilrudy4787's Avatar
lilrudy4787 lilrudy4787 is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Centerville
Posts: 1,546
Thanks: 145
Thanked 255 Times in 163 Posts
lilrudy4787 will become famous soon enough
Originally Posted by Rick Scaia View Post
Ahem: http://www.midmajority.com/2009/02/m...-2009.php#more

So the committee uses WHAT, now? Want a do-over on that one?

No argument that there are other, more complex ratings schemes out there to look at, depending on what you're trying to rank (Sagarin is related to RPI and is just a more robust power rankings system, whereas KenPom doesn't care at all about describing past/existing wins and DOES care more about his system being predictive for future games which isn't even close to what you want in a selection heuristic), but not a one of those other rankings is even on the selection committee's radar. RPI is the one and only number in the room when they make their picks.

The committee's ability to emphasize or marginalize RPI to suit their needs (it clearly counts differently for different teams' resumes) may speak to a subjective application of the numbers, but it's still -- as a simple matter of fact and record as outlined in the above link for all to see/comprehend -- the only objective rankings data in use.

And hey, this is the first week when RPI becomes sorta-maybe-kinda-relevent and our objective rankings look GOOD. So hooray for RPI...


Rick
Ahem....what?

If you really read anything, you would see the RPI is used as a strict GUIDELINE, a member of the committee is allowed to use whatever methods they see fit to rank a team. It would naive to think atleast one person doesnt look at all three of these ranking systems.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-12-2009, 05:57 PM
San Diego Flyer's Avatar
San Diego Flyer San Diego Flyer is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 14,788
Thanks: 10,086
Thanked 10,502 Times in 4,704 Posts
San Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond reputeSan Diego Flyer has a reputation beyond repute
As we know, a "good" RPI is never a safe bet either, but 3 losses in a row to lower tier A10 teams will sink your boat. I worry about bad losses and we have none of those yet.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-12-2009, 07:29 PM
The Wright Stuff's Avatar
The Wright Stuff The Wright Stuff is offline
1st Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 210
Thanks: 222
Thanked 178 Times in 69 Posts
The Wright Stuff is a glorious beacon of lightThe Wright Stuff is a glorious beacon of lightThe Wright Stuff is a glorious beacon of lightThe Wright Stuff is a glorious beacon of lightThe Wright Stuff is a glorious beacon of light
The game at New Mexico is looming larger and larger. The Lobos are currently 9-0 with an RPI of 31 (although their SOS is only 164).

Assuming the Flyers take care of business against Presbyterian, Appalachain St, and Boston U, they'll be 10-2 going into the Pit.

New Mexico is playing an 8-1 Texas A&M team tonight, followed by games against Northern AZ, Creighton, Oral Roberts, and Texas Tech.

If UD can somehow come away with a win at New Mexico, that would be a nice boost to the Flyers RPI, and a quality road win. Beat Ball St and UD will be a solid 12-2 heading into A10 play.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-12-2009, 07:31 PM
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ's Avatar
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ ClearTheRunwayForWLJ is offline
Locked
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: On an island
Posts: 1,783
Thanks: 175
Thanked 576 Times in 305 Posts
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these partsClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these partsClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by lilrudy4787 View Post
Ahem....what?

If you really read anything, you would see the RPI is used as a strict GUIDELINE, a member of the committee is allowed to use whatever methods they see fit to rank a team. It would naive to think atleast one person doesnt look at all three of these ranking systems.

No way in hell does the committee use two theorists opinion to make their selection for the final 10 teams come selection Sunday.

Pomeroy is a theorist, his theories include a "luck factor" which means a team like UD for example will struggle in his ratings because all their games are close.

The committee has many available options for information and one man's opinion (Pomeroy) is not used.

Last edited by ClearTheRunwayForWLJ; 12-12-2009 at 08:35 PM..
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to ClearTheRunwayForWLJ For This Totally Excellent Post:
Flyer4ever24 (12-12-2009), IAFlyer (12-12-2009)
  #16  
Old 12-12-2009, 08:29 PM
TA111 TA111 is offline
General of the Air Force
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,071
Thanks: 3,440
Thanked 4,690 Times in 2,510 Posts
TA111 has a reputation beyond reputeTA111 has a reputation beyond reputeTA111 has a reputation beyond reputeTA111 has a reputation beyond reputeTA111 has a reputation beyond reputeTA111 has a reputation beyond reputeTA111 has a reputation beyond reputeTA111 has a reputation beyond reputeTA111 has a reputation beyond reputeTA111 has a reputation beyond reputeTA111 has a reputation beyond repute
The mock selection show on ESPN last year showed that the only rating system in the room was RPI. However, RPI is just one of many factors used and is actually more important in seeding teams than selecting them. Good wins and bad losses and where these wins and losses took place. Right now (and I emphasize RIGHT NOW) UD is in pretty good shape having both losses to top 25 teams on a neutral court and 2 for 2 in road wins.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-12-2009, 08:52 PM
IAFlyer IAFlyer is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 4,473
Thanks: 6,848
Thanked 1,569 Times in 939 Posts
IAFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeIAFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeIAFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeIAFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeIAFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeIAFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeIAFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeIAFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeIAFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeIAFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeIAFlyer has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by lilrudy4787 View Post
Ahem....what?

If you really read anything, you would see the RPI is used as a strict GUIDELINE, a member of the committee is allowed to use whatever methods they see fit to rank a team. It would naive to think atleast one person doesnt look at all three of these ranking systems.
As Cleartherunway and others pointed out -- the only numbers in the room are RPI -- and it is used for seeding vs. selection.

Pomeroy would never be used for selection or seeding. Sagarin could have some validity, but is not used.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-12-2009, 09:07 PM
Flyer 86's Avatar
Flyer 86 Flyer 86 is offline
General
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 7,170
Thanks: 31,807
Thanked 1,266 Times in 784 Posts
Flyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond reputeFlyer 86 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by IAFlyer View Post
As Cleartherunway and others pointed out -- the only numbers in the room are RPI -- and it is used for seeding vs. selection.

Pomeroy would never be used for selection or seeding. Sagarin could have some validity, but is not used.
so are we saying that in private the selection people never read Pom or Sagarin to bolster their opinions or facts?

of course rpi is only official method.
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to Flyer 86 For This Totally Excellent Post:
lilrudy4787 (12-12-2009)
  #19  
Old 12-13-2009, 07:19 PM
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ's Avatar
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ ClearTheRunwayForWLJ is offline
Locked
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: On an island
Posts: 1,783
Thanks: 175
Thanked 576 Times in 305 Posts
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these partsClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these partsClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these parts
SOS and RPI are the number one factors, as well as total wins.

If Pomeroy was used UD would have been a four seed in the NIT last season and in the CIT the year before.

In a short answer, no. The committee does not read Pomeroy at all to make a decision. They are locked in a room with only certain information presented to them.

It is ludicrous to think that professionals (in their right) would use a theorists (Pomeroy) assertion to decide the final dozen teams or so.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-13-2009, 08:29 PM
lilrudy4787's Avatar
lilrudy4787 lilrudy4787 is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Centerville
Posts: 1,546
Thanks: 145
Thanked 255 Times in 163 Posts
lilrudy4787 will become famous soon enough
Originally Posted by ClearTheRunwayForWLJ View Post
It is ludicrous to think that professionals (in their right) would use a theorists (Pomeroy) assertion to decide the final dozen teams or so.
So the RPI wasnt create by a "theorist" and doesnt use the same kind of statistical methods to draw conclusions?

Pomeroy and Sagarin are just new school thought built upon a old school idea (RPI)

The RPI is based on the same foundations Pomeroy and Sagarin draw their conclusions on(except much more advanced)

Thanks for saying that and invalidating your argument.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-13-2009, 08:59 PM
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ's Avatar
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ ClearTheRunwayForWLJ is offline
Locked
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: On an island
Posts: 1,783
Thanks: 175
Thanked 576 Times in 305 Posts
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these partsClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these partsClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these parts
My argument is sound, because it is fact.

In your school of thought UD would have been a bubble team in the NIT. They were near definitely over 70 in Pomeroy rankings.

A group of people put together the RPI, SOS and made it the staple along with wins and losses of the most important criteria to make the NCAA Tournament.

The came along some random guy who decided that "luck" is a factor in winning games and he wanted to make a little money so he started his own website, his own theory based off of original findings.

His method is garbage. It is not "new school" it is his way of factoring how good a team is and if anyone considers "luck" to make you a good team then you are out of your mind.

The committee has no clue what Pomeroy is on selection Sunday, none. Kyle Whelliston from mid majority was allowed to sit in on a selection committee meeting and reported that they didn't even allow the internet to be open. They had facts placed in front of them by department chairs, that included rpi, sos, ooc sos, w/l, last ten games, road record, wins vs top 25 rpi, wins vs. top 50 rpi, wins vs. top 100 rpi, losses vs. top 100 rpi. Conferences were not even a factor in the decision making, just teams listed.

Pomeroy is a hack who cashed in on crap.

Last edited by ClearTheRunwayForWLJ; 12-13-2009 at 09:02 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-13-2009, 08:59 PM
cralford's Avatar
cralford cralford is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 614
Thanks: 925
Thanked 293 Times in 161 Posts
cralford has a reputation beyond reputecralford has a reputation beyond reputecralford has a reputation beyond reputecralford has a reputation beyond reputecralford has a reputation beyond reputecralford has a reputation beyond reputecralford has a reputation beyond reputecralford has a reputation beyond reputecralford has a reputation beyond reputecralford has a reputation beyond reputecralford has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by lilrudy4787 View Post
Ahem....what?

If you really read anything, you would see the RPI is used as a strict GUIDELINE, a member of the committee is allowed to use whatever methods they see fit to rank a team. It would naive to think atleast one person doesnt look at all three of these ranking systems.
OK, now you have gone from the RPI being outdated and the sagarin and pomeroy systems being the predominant ranking systems used by the selection committee to saying that at least one person on the committee uses all three.

I will admit that I have never been in the selection room and do not know what they use but I have never heard the sagarin or pomeroy systems even mentioned by any of the experts that explain the selection process.

I think you like them so you just decided to blow smoke out your butt and made a statement that you have no possible way to corroborate.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-13-2009, 09:01 PM
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ's Avatar
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ ClearTheRunwayForWLJ is offline
Locked
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: On an island
Posts: 1,783
Thanks: 175
Thanked 576 Times in 305 Posts
ClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these partsClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these partsClearTheRunwayForWLJ is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by cralford View Post
I will admit that I have never been in the selection room and do not know what they use but I have never heard the sagarin or pomeroy systems even mentioned by any of the experts that explain the selection process.

See above. Whelliston was in it last year and listed the items.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement System V2.6 By   Branden

     
 
Copyright 1996-2012 UDPride.com. All Rights Reserved.