UDPride Discussion Forums    
     

Go Back   UDPride Discussion Forums > UDPRIDE SPORTS FORUMS > Mens Basketball

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Advertisement
View Poll Results: FT Lane violation(s)...MAKE THE CALL!
NDSU violation negates the air ball violation - Crosby re-shoots FT 26 83.87%
Double violation - goes to possession arrow 4 12.90%
Second violation (airball) negates first violation (in lane early) - NDSU ball 1 3.23%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2017, 10:03 AM
rollo's Avatar
rollo rollo is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RolloCon
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 16,238
Thanked 15,878 Times in 6,982 Posts
rollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond repute
You Make the Call - Double FT violation

In an effort to improve his focus at the FT line, Anthony Grant has been working hard with PG John Crosby on his form. The career 47% FT shooter needs help, especially this season as he has been slotted at the starting PG in today's home opener of the 2017-18 season.

Despite the extra time and effort of the coaching staff, Crosby still has a hitch in his form that needs to be eliminated in order to make the shot appear to be smooth. So here we are, 1:15 into game 1 and Crosby is at the FT line shooting 2. Having already badly missed the first, both UD and North Dakota State players are understandably anticipating a brick and are anxiously positioning themselves for a clank and rebound opportunity.

As Crosby begins his shot, he ever-so-slightly hesitates on the release and draws two NDSU players into the lane early. The baseline official immediately signals for the defensive lane violation...meanwhile Crosby releases the shot...which is a complete airball...and is also a violation.

Not seeing the baseline official's lane violation signal, Lead official Joey DeMayo blows the play dead and because of the airball, awards the ball to NDSU. Grant immediately jumps up and argues that the NDSU player violated first and distracted Crosby so he should be given another FT. DeMayo, looking puzzled, calls the other officials over for a quick huddle.

As WHIO-TV's Mike Ballsack tells us all to call 1-800-GET-JUNK, you have 30-seconds to MAKE THE CALL!

Good luck.
__________________
I shaved my balls for this?

Last edited by rollo; 06-19-2017 at 10:33 AM..
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
  #2  
Old 06-19-2017, 11:11 AM
KC Flyer KC Flyer is offline
1st Lieutenant
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 109
Thanks: 38
Thanked 35 Times in 20 Posts
KC Flyer is a jewel in the roughKC Flyer is a jewel in the roughKC Flyer is a jewel in the rough
I think it is a double violation and then possession arrow, but what would the call be if the NDSU player distracts the shooter with his violation (either on purpose or accident). Is that still just a FT violation or change to a Technical foul?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-19-2017, 11:22 AM
rollo's Avatar
rollo rollo is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RolloCon
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 16,238
Thanked 15,878 Times in 6,982 Posts
rollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by KC Flyer View Post
I think it is a double violation and then possession arrow, but what would the call be if the NDSU player distracts the shooter with his violation (either on purpose or accident). Is that still just a FT violation or change to a Technical foul?
That is 'disconcertion' and falls under 'unsportmanlike conduct' which would trump any lane violation(s).
__________________
I shaved my balls for this?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-19-2017, 11:39 AM
cj cj is offline
General of the Air Force
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,001
Thanks: 3,691
Thanked 5,152 Times in 2,713 Posts
cj has a reputation beyond reputecj has a reputation beyond reputecj has a reputation beyond reputecj has a reputation beyond reputecj has a reputation beyond reputecj has a reputation beyond reputecj has a reputation beyond reputecj has a reputation beyond reputecj has a reputation beyond reputecj has a reputation beyond reputecj has a reputation beyond repute
I voted A
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-19-2017, 11:55 AM
rollo's Avatar
rollo rollo is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RolloCon
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 16,238
Thanked 15,878 Times in 6,982 Posts
rollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by cj View Post
I voted A
Nothing wrong with 'A'.

__________________
I shaved my balls for this?
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to rollo For This Totally Excellent Post:
CT Flyer (06-19-2017), TXFlyerFan (06-19-2017)
  #6  
Old 06-19-2017, 01:00 PM
TXFlyerFan TXFlyerFan is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,897
Thanks: 1,341
Thanked 1,303 Times in 675 Posts
TXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond repute
Without trying to overanalyze and convince myself there is a trick, if Ref A signaled a lane violation first, then anything that happens after that, short of a technical foul of some sort, is another FT attempt.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-19-2017, 03:11 PM
rollo's Avatar
rollo rollo is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RolloCon
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 16,238
Thanked 15,878 Times in 6,982 Posts
rollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by TXFlyerFan View Post
Without trying to overanalyze and convince myself there is a trick,...
If your mind is clear and you're focused on the rules, this is an easy call. This should help you focus...

__________________
I shaved my balls for this?
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to rollo For This Totally Excellent Post:
TXFlyerFan (06-19-2017)
  #8  
Old 06-19-2017, 04:22 PM
MNFats's Avatar
MNFats MNFats is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,040
Thanks: 1,435
Thanked 1,367 Times in 537 Posts
MNFats has a reputation beyond reputeMNFats has a reputation beyond reputeMNFats has a reputation beyond reputeMNFats has a reputation beyond reputeMNFats has a reputation beyond reputeMNFats has a reputation beyond reputeMNFats has a reputation beyond reputeMNFats has a reputation beyond reputeMNFats has a reputation beyond reputeMNFats has a reputation beyond reputeMNFats has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by rollo View Post
Nothing wrong with 'A'.

Those are most certainly not A's. Those are C's.
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to MNFats For This Totally Excellent Post:
rollo (06-19-2017), TXFlyerFan (06-19-2017)
  #9  
Old 06-19-2017, 04:31 PM
rollo's Avatar
rollo rollo is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RolloCon
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 16,238
Thanked 15,878 Times in 6,982 Posts
rollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond repute
It's been 6+ hours since I posted this poll and Sir Know-it-All, ClaytonFlyer, hasn't chimed in yet. Not being shy or afraid to put his foot in his royal mouth, it appears that I have stumped the pseudo-king and he's scouring GOOGLE looking for the answer.

Clayton....Sir Clayton....

__________________
I shaved my balls for this?
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to rollo For This Totally Excellent Post:
TXFlyerFan (06-19-2017)
  #10  
Old 06-19-2017, 04:36 PM
TXFlyerFan TXFlyerFan is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,897
Thanks: 1,341
Thanked 1,303 Times in 675 Posts
TXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeTXFlyerFan has a reputation beyond repute
He's busy checkout out "A"
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-19-2017, 04:37 PM
ClaytonFlyerFan's Avatar
ClaytonFlyerFan ClaytonFlyerFan is offline
General of the Air Force
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,042
Thanks: 8,803
Thanked 8,558 Times in 3,703 Posts
ClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by rollo View Post
It's been 6+ hours since I posted this poll and Sir Know-it-All, ClaytonFlyer, hasn't chimed in yet. Not being shy or afraid to put his foot in his royal mouth, it appears that I have stumped the pseudo-king and he's scouring GOOGLE looking for the answer.

Clayton....Sir Clayton....

]
I skipped 3rd through 5th grade as well as most of high school, too smart for my peers. So why would I want to spend my time answering a 3rd grade question?

PS- If this is not the easiest one to answer you have ever posted, the rule absolutely sucks and 19 of my peers have currently answered wrong along with me!

Happy now Archie Bunker?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-19-2017, 04:37 PM
ClaytonFlyerFan's Avatar
ClaytonFlyerFan ClaytonFlyerFan is offline
General of the Air Force
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,042
Thanks: 8,803
Thanked 8,558 Times in 3,703 Posts
ClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by TXFlyerFan View Post
He's busy checkout out "A"
The only thing that takes precedence in my life over Flyer basketball (other than family) is lake season which kicked off for me 3 days ago, and hanging out at the right cove to be surrounded by a few A', several B's, lots of C's and my preference of D's. 84 degree water temperature currently, so yes I will be busy and not on here as often the next 5 months. I know I will be missed

Last edited by ClaytonFlyerFan; 06-19-2017 at 04:46 PM..
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to ClaytonFlyerFan For This Totally Excellent Post:
rollo (06-19-2017), TXFlyerFan (06-20-2017)
  #13  
Old 06-19-2017, 04:52 PM
rollo's Avatar
rollo rollo is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RolloCon
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 16,238
Thanked 15,878 Times in 6,982 Posts
rollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ClaytonFlyerFan View Post
I skipped 3rd through 5th grade as well as most of high school,
So, Mr. Double-D, how was Juvie Hall?

__________________
I shaved my balls for this?
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to rollo For This Totally Excellent Post:
ClaytonFlyerFan (06-19-2017), Gazoo (06-20-2017)
  #14  
Old 06-20-2017, 10:38 AM
88flyer 88flyer is offline
1st Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 192
Thanks: 113
Thanked 150 Times in 52 Posts
88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by rollo View Post
That is 'disconcertion' and falls under 'unsportmanlike conduct' which would trump any lane violation(s).
In my mind, this answers the question. The initial violation by the opponent trumps the subsequent airball. Now, if JC had intentionally faked a shot to draw them into the lane, then his violation would trump theirs effectively. But, you didn't say he faked a shot to intentionally draw them off the line. I'm sticking with the majority on this one...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-20-2017, 12:31 PM
rollo's Avatar
rollo rollo is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RolloCon
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 16,238
Thanked 15,878 Times in 6,982 Posts
rollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by 88flyer View Post
... if JC had intentionally faked a shot to draw them into the lane, then his violation would trump theirs effectively...
Faking a FT is not a delayed call - it's immediate - so there wouldn't be another violation to be trumped.

Just sayin'...
__________________
I shaved my balls for this?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-20-2017, 03:39 PM
88flyer 88flyer is offline
1st Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 192
Thanks: 113
Thanked 150 Times in 52 Posts
88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by rollo View Post
Faking a FT is not a delayed call - it's immediate - so there wouldn't be another violation to be trumped.

Just sayin'...
so... with this little tidbit - i'm sticking with A
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-23-2017, 10:36 AM
rollo's Avatar
rollo rollo is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RolloCon
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 16,238
Thanked 15,878 Times in 6,982 Posts
rollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond repute
If you were one of the 4 who voted 'double violation - possession arrow' you win!

Defensive violations during a FT are 'delayed' meaning other things can happen that need to be applied, too. And just as a double-foul leads to an 'alternating possession' situation, so, too, does a double-violation.

It's complicated, I know, and expect a lot of WTF's from my millions of fans and minions, and I'll try to explain your concerns, just don't go all extreme on me. King Rollo doesn't reply to extremes unless it relates to bikinis or biceps.

Hate away...the King is in the mood!
__________________
I shaved my balls for this?
Reply With Quote
Mad Props to rollo For This Totally Excellent Post:
cj (06-23-2017)
  #18  
Old 06-23-2017, 11:38 AM
88flyer 88flyer is offline
1st Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 192
Thanks: 113
Thanked 150 Times in 52 Posts
88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of88flyer has much to be proud of
hmmm... it seems there is room for interpretation here. If the official that called the initial lane violation felt there was disconcertion, then this applies...

c. When disconcertion by an opponent is followed by a violation by the
free- thrower or a teammate of the free-thrower, only the disconcertion is
penalized and a substitute free throw shall be awarded.

Does disconcertion imply an intentional distraction?

I'm just learning here... certainly no expert.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-23-2017, 11:46 AM
ClaytonFlyerFan's Avatar
ClaytonFlyerFan ClaytonFlyerFan is offline
General of the Air Force
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,042
Thanks: 8,803
Thanked 8,558 Times in 3,703 Posts
ClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by rollo View Post
If you were one of the 4 who voted 'double violation - possession arrow' you win!

Defensive violations during a FT are 'delayed' meaning other things can happen that need to be applied, too. And just as a double-foul leads to an 'alternating possession' situation, so, too, does a double-violation.

It's complicated, I know, and expect a lot of WTF's from my millions of fans and minions, and I'll try to explain your concerns, just don't go all extreme on me. King Rollo doesn't reply to extremes unless it relates to bikinis or biceps.

Hate away...the King is in the mood!

I think you been growing and smoking your breakfast, surely the NCAA is not that stupid on this rule when the lane violation occurred first and in theory distracted the shooter. Oh wait, we are talking the NCAA here, guess I believe anything.

I know, don't call you surely.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-23-2017, 12:14 PM
rollo's Avatar
rollo rollo is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RolloCon
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 16,238
Thanked 15,878 Times in 6,982 Posts
rollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by 88flyer View Post
hmmm... it seems there is room for interpretation here. If the official that called the initial lane violation felt there was disconcertion, then this applies...

c. When disconcertion by an opponent is followed by a violation by the
free- thrower or a teammate of the free-thrower, only the disconcertion is
penalized and a substitute free throw shall be awarded.

Does disconcertion imply an intentional distraction?

I'm just learning here... certainly no expert.
Disconcertion is something intentional like coughing, clapping or yelling during the shooting process...stepping into the lane isn't disconcertion unless you're also doing jumping-jacks and/or cartwheels.

Or, in the case of a 3rd grade boys game I did earlier this year, two opposing moms ringing their f'in cow bells during opponent's FTs...or idiot Franklin 5th grade girl parents setting off their phone's ringer while little Suzie-Q tries to shoot a 12-foot FT.

Idiots are everywhere.

Normal people are outnumbered by them 5:1.

Royal immortals are outnumbered 318M:1.

King Rollo the Underdog...OUT!
__________________
I shaved my balls for this?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-23-2017, 12:42 PM
rollo's Avatar
rollo rollo is offline
Committed to this Web Site and Your Enjoyment!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RolloCon
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 16,238
Thanked 15,878 Times in 6,982 Posts
rollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond reputerollo has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ClaytonFlyerFan View Post
PS- If this is not the easiest one to answer you have ever posted, the rule absolutely sucks and 19 of my peers have currently answered wrong along with me!
Originally Posted by ClaytonFlyerFan View Post
I think you been growing and smoking your breakfast, surely the NCAA is not that stupid on this rule when the lane violation occurred first and in theory distracted the shooter. Oh wait, we are talking the NCAA here, guess I believe anything.

I know, don't call you surely.
Sounds like the Assistant Deputy to the Deputy Assistant of the Royal Court got this call wrong.

Originally Posted by ClaytonFlyerFan View Post
I skipped 3rd through 5th grade as well as most of high school, too smart for my peers. So why would I want to spend my time answering a 3rd grade question?
Clayton Elementary just called and has openings in all grades...you'll just need a birth certificate and proof of residence to enroll. Good luck...I hear 'cursive' is pretty tough these days!
__________________
I shaved my balls for this?
Reply With Quote
2 UDPriders Offer Mad Props to rollo For This Totally Excellent Post:
ClaytonFlyerFan (06-25-2017), Gazoo (06-24-2017)
  #22  
Old 06-25-2017, 09:40 PM
ClaytonFlyerFan's Avatar
ClaytonFlyerFan ClaytonFlyerFan is offline
General of the Air Force
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,042
Thanks: 8,803
Thanked 8,558 Times in 3,703 Posts
ClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond reputeClaytonFlyerFan has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by rollo View Post
Sounds like the Assistant Deputy to the Deputy Assistant of the Royal Court got this call wrong.



Clayton Elementary just called and has openings in all grades...you'll just need a birth certificate and proof of residence to enroll. Good luck...I hear 'cursive' is pretty tough these days!

Quit bullying me or I am calling my snowflake police to report you.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement System V2.6 By   Branden

     
 
Copyright 1996-2012 UDPride.com. All Rights Reserved.